TedDoesntTalk

The article says $11 billion. That’s ridiculous.

Although I don’t agree with your phrasing, $11 billion to bring back some rocks when we have a $40+ trillion deficit makes no sense.

You think the hugging face incident was a stunt? Can you explain?

> The thing we considered the most troubling was whether AIs could autonomously acquire resources by running businesses.

So we decided to build that to validate and confirm our fears.

… but he’s not using a “hacking model”

I think he means this:

https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/

Great point.

Is this why Oregon Trail Deluxe freezes on Mac?

https://oregontrail.ws/games/the-oregon-trail-deluxe/play/

I will make miniature dioramas and photograph them.

Even easier is to just take a picture of an AI-generated picture.

Propagation

Sophisticated attacks will always leverage multiple vulnerabilities. That’s why you have to think of any vulnerability holistically, not in isolation.

What is the point of that? Why is that better than using the harness directly?

Were you still alive after paying it off?

Agree. I almost never watch them when posted in comments. Sometimes if it’s a main article I might.

Java has a lesson of what can go wrong with types, just as parent says. That example is dates and times. So many types…

And before Java finally settled on what we have today, we had 3rd-party libraries like jodatime that tried to fix it.

I guess it’s in a good state today, but it took a LocalDateTime.MAX to get there. I mean an Instant.MAX. No, I mean an OffsetDateTime.MAX. No, I mean new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE). Oh wait I meant new Timestamp(Long.MAX_VALUE). No, I mean LocalTime.MAX.

I’ll stop now, but i could go on.

I’m in the USA and have a Tenda WiFi usb stick. Not as popular as other brands but they are around

> So it was undiscovered for 16 years until now

Publicly undiscovered

Cardinality is the easy way to resolve this. If the data has a cardinality of 1, it should be an attribute. If cardinality > 1, it should be a child element/node.

Loyalists were gone by from America by the mid-1780s.

I found it interesting that you used the term European several times, but never once the term American. He served in the American military, lived in America, had an American father (according to the article).

So you consider 19th century America to be Europe, or is there another reason for your choice of words?

How much does corporate espionage help them?

He could have sold those printouts instead of giving them away.

Experts have beginner’s mind.

Great story. Had no idea. Still love the name Uwe. One of those German names that doesn’t have an English equivalent unlike, say, Pieter.

> the more they will tend to gradually pull that into some homogenous abstract equilibrium

I experienced this with resume editing. The LLM removes everything that differentiates my resume from a pile of junior engineers with “average” experience. Anything that was special or unique or different was eventually replaced with generic stuff

Of course I didn’t use what it produced, but it was maddening because the LLM kept insisting this was better than what I had.

I found LLMs to be much more useful in suggesting edits to very small chunks of my resume (a sentence or three) rather than the overall vision of the document.

You may disagree with Freud, but he is responsible for mental health therapy becoming a socially acceptable practice in the West.

Where does he mention “without Robux”?

It’s not debt bondage in Roblox. It’s company scrip

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_scrip

The CEO does not say it’s a horrible idea. The interviewers say that. CEO says it’s “brilliant idea”.