Tohhou

Any infringement of free speech is a step toward hell.

Brazil is breaking its own constitution and its judges are punishing legal representatives of X.

Do you don't hold people in the US to the same standard? No? Then you're just evil.

This is an inflammatory comment. Shame on you.

What's the point in this article if pifo isn't open source?

Here's a tutorial on my software... you can't use it!!!

When you draw an illustration with software stabilization, who owns the copyright?

archive.org does forget, they will take this down as soon as Rockstar tells them to.

archive.org will bend to censors very easily unfortunately.

Embarrassing for OpenAI.

You're one of the ones who used to call bitcoin "buttcoin" didn't you? Very sure of yourself, very wrong.

You must not use AI if you think this. AI is not the bubble. Everything AI will replace is the bubble.

Western countries have lower rates than Japan when you exclude for native birth rates. Western countries get a big boost in birth rate when you account for non-natives having population booms.

Data doesn't back up what you think. Have you looked at the data or are you going based on hearsay?

>the Levitical laws are typically not taken as binding for Christians

http://www.evilbible.com/do_not_ignore_ot.htm

That's amazing to me that you have never, ever given any money to the Salvation Army. You may be a unicorn who has never donated to anything which supports an anti-gay agenda good for you.

>Your position proclaims that if all things apply, then nothing applies

I'm saying that if it's enough to fired someone over donating to a bill that is anti-gay then it's enough to fire someone for donating over and over and over again to a church which fuels constant anti-gay agenda. Not just Christianity but Judaism or Islam which are even more explicitly anti-gay - logically anyone who is a Jew or Muslim should be targeted next by the social justice witch hunt.

>was made obsolete

No, Jesus said himself that all of the old laws still hold true.

http://www.evilbible.com/do_not_ignore_ot.htm

>Please don't straw man an entire faith because of your own misunderstanding of the beliefs of some.

It's hard to read their holy book which they claim is the word of god and not judge them as awful people.

Again my point is that no one knows what money they give or spend is used to fuel anti-gay agenda, and so everyone is unfit. This is where the witch hunt will go.

Leviticus

Homosexual acts are an abomination to God. 18:22 If a man has sex with another man, kill them both. 20:13

Something about wanting their cake and eating it too.

Beside this, my point is that even if people join this church, they have undoubtedly donated money to an anti-gay church in the past, which makes them forever unworthy apparently.

Read my post I gave two examples and you were not specific.

> has never given money to a church.

I am doubtful, because even if you managed to never go to any church and never give a cent at any age, you can still give money to churches through institutions which seem secular. The Salvation Army is anti-gay and collects money every year from most popular store fronts. Never given them a cent? Never purchased Purina brand dog food? Never paid for anything related to Exxon? You can't know what money you give to someone or pay for something which which ultimately doesn't fuel anti-gay agenda. That's my point.

Is your bible the inerrant word of your god? If not then does it have any legitimacy? Is homosexuality a sin?

I have yet to find someone like you who who at some point does not admit they are anti-gay. They say they are not, and then you find out they are due to holding two contradictory views at once. Even then you've never given money to any church than ones you know for a fact are 100% not anti-gay, have no one in power who is not anti-gay? That is the parallel.

You really think supporting homosexuals is a common trait in churches anywhere? "Being gay isn't bad if you don't act on it." Oh, yeah, sure. Totally not anti-gay.

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/gay/long.htm

Anyone who thinks this book is golden is anti-gay no matter how they spin their politics.

Anyone who has ever donated to a church is in the same boat. You would be hard pressed to not find someone who hasn't given money to a church in some form, and equally hard pressed to not find a church which is not anti-gay, has not had any anti-gay activity at all in any form.

They are all scum. None are fit to have jobs anywhere. It would be better for those who have been leaders of companies, leading them to prosperity, to burn than let them stay - fire them all, everyone. Yes, you too.

Not just Christianity but Judaism or Islam which are even more explicitly anti-gay - logically anyone who is a Jew or Muslim should be targeted next by the social justice witch hunt.

Edit: Many downvotes! Self righteous hypocrites rejoice! You enable anti-gay hate. You disgust me.

This is what is happening.

Then the "problem" should be self correcting assuming the companies which make money survive (which they do), and those which don't focus on making money evaporate (which they do). Or maybe it's not a "problem" if only some companies are doing it, because they value things which the older people don't have interest in, and so the older people self select themselves out by choice.

Is there a list of companies which value profit so the people who complain about the "problem" (from companies most likely to not be around after too long) can go work for them?

This kills the Hacker News.

>(PS. "regardless" not "irregardless")

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Many incorrect words are common in my area's dialect.

Hacker News is seriously business only. No fun allowed, because a sense of humor is problematic.

To use their own phrasing, I won't be tone policed, thanks. If you have something specific to say in regards to the content of my post then say it. My irreverence toward SJWism has been earned.

See: http://www.reddit.com/r/TumblrInAction

She is a person who thinks that Adria Richards of donglegate did nothing wrong.

She is public friends with a group of high functioning SJWs (and for this reason stay the fuck away from them unless you want to be character assassinated - they are throwing that around a lot right now) who think GitHub of all places is the pinnacle of misogynistic, explicitly female hating culture. If that's GitHub then truly tech is doomed, but then again this is SJW world where any mostly male environment is a hostile work environment, where things like libertarianism is hated because they don't value equality of opportunity and instead demand equality of outcome irregardless of merit. They think that feelings, that status matters more than results... you know, building things, making the world a better place one little thing at a time instead of always being on complaining.

Internet trolls being assholes has nothing to do with sexism. People who feed the trolls, who are male and female, get burned. Let the idiots burn. And yeah I've been called a gender traitor by the SJW idiots because I don't agree with their idea that feminism = females.

That's female chauvinist ape, shitlord!

>What's next - calling everyone who disagrees "sexist"?

If you disagree then you are automatically labeled as one of the obvious sexist rapist rape apologist pedophile neckbeard supremacist spermjacked nerd sperglord virgin libertarian losers. They can't possibly be wrong, so if you disagree you must be one of the hell bound sinners of the most dire nightmare.

>"Avoid editing what you want to say in your head, and try not to worry about being wrong."

This is very sexist of them. Their implication is that males are stupid and don't ever censor themselves when they work to be good leaders - that they are only gain leader status because they say every dumb idea they have, and that saying stupid things shouldn't have any consequences.