You called the fact I raised a "tired talking point" and referenced a contentious source. While they do cite serious academics, they seem to draw their own conclusions in the text; unburdened by their references.
379 karma · joined December 16, 2021
You called the fact I raised a "tired talking point" and referenced a contentious source. While they do cite serious academics, they seem to draw their own conclusions in the text; unburdened by their references.
While this one was on page 3-4 and the other post is (stilL) on the first page.
It is no surprise to me that an organization originally founded by the chairman of General Motors, the president of Standard Oil and their like [0] is able to conclude:
>"The top 1 percent of Americans today do not face an unusually low tax burden, by historical standards."
Which is a wild claim to make.
Nice that you find the somewhat honest footnote, but you're citing what is essentially an opinion piece from a conservative think tank.
I am not familiar with the particulars, but I am sure there is information published by the union explaining their position in more detail.
I reject your suggestion that I am ignorant how unions operate. I have been a member of a union for many years. Larger decisions are decided by voting.
Like democracy, unions are not perfect. But historically unions have been effective at negotiating rights for workers (weekends, 8hour workdays etc.)
I would argue they are one of the few ways labour has been able to impact policy and law.
In the US, the top federal rate was around 90% through the 1940s and early 1960s, then 70% through the 1970s.
https://taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/how-do-federal-inc...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/teresaghilarducci/2025/12/29/do...
Allowing people to nominate representatives to argue policy is the foundation of representative democracy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ablation_(artificial_intellige...
Why is it so hard to write out an acronym once...
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/19/elon-musk-tesla-will-have-al...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_predictions_for_autono...
This is a circular definition. In order to properly define the concept, we must be able to word it without using "computing devices" in the definition.
Finding a satisfactory definition for what constitutes a "Computation" is actually an interesting debate goes back to the 1600s. Currently, the mainstream definition (from wikipedia) gives that: "A computation is any type of arithmetic or non-arithmetic calculation that is well-defined".
One way to understand the author is to learn more about the "The mapping account" theory behind computation: "a physical system can be said to perform a specific computation when there is a mapping between the state of that system and the computation such that the 'microphysical states [of the system] mirror the state transitions between the computational states.'"
"[...] Identifying which side of the marketplace is more scarce and focusing on supplying that."
On the other hand, reading a book is like getting on a boat. You've made certain preparations for acquiring the vessel and set course through unknown territory. A journey away from the shore and away from what's immediately at hand, which can also turn out to be a journey towards self-discovery.
What an absolute embarrassment. Income inequality will lead to societal collapse