2,243 karma · joined November 22, 2016
1) A person was shot by someone at the scene
2) A different person who was in conflict with the first person had a gun with the same ballistic profile (caliber etc.)
3) There are two separate parties with an interest in the outcome who witnessed the crime
4) The first party with an interest, was actively aggrivating people at the scene, causing hightened tensions
5) The second party was in direct conflict with the first
I have a hard time believing the first party shot their own in order to press charges on the second party. It doesn't pass the Occam's razor test, TBHEDIT: I suck at formatting
If the employee is doing all that's expected of them, then the "contract for owning someone for a period of time" (not my words - and relatively creepy) should be fulfilled. It doesn't seem a period of time that is expected but a force of work delivered.
I am willing to be wrong in this assumption, however, given the right argument.
Sorry to ask so many questions, but as a maker of personal projects which are games, I'm curious about the promotion and monetization of mobile games =)
EDIT: serious question; would Slack be professional networking or, how does that work under this bill? It's DMing for business, but it isn't really networking.
Would an incident like this make other banks shore up their defenses about this sort of thing happening to them, or will more banks fall due to market conditions in general?
Don't forget the evils of "harmful lyrics" that Tipper Gore saved us from. That was teaching children forbidden concepts like inner city music and dangerous metal music.
All worked out in the end though =)
Finally I started hobbies at home totally removed from what I did at work, knowing I would be bad at them. Knowing I could give up on them. Knowing there was no pressure to finish or be good at a thing helped me alleviate the pressure of work where I had to perform.
Not to be a complete downer, but there is so much special interest money involved in our political system, neither the Democrats or the Republicans are on your side. They are both on the moneyed interest side. These political footballs are, for the most part, to string along voters on "hot button" issues to keep the public disinterested on the numerous things that these parties actually agree on, like expanded military spending, global expansionism, corporate tax reduction, lessening monopoly laws, reducing banking restrictions, reducing spending on interstate infrastructure, cutting education spending and restricting the ability for fair and equal elections through redistricting. All of these (and more I can't think of) are bipartisan efforts.
Sorry... I shouldn't watch the news. It's a bummer =)
You might look into it. It fosters a lot more than just healthy food. It builds neighborhoods, reclaims land and makes friends in the community. They're great.