I was interested in the concept but after looking at the source code and the architecture I think I agree with the "not sure that this is a good approach" conclusion.
Was this something you had planned to announce prior to the whole Terraform kerfuffle and it is just unfortunate timing, or was this precipitated by that event in any way?
I've heard some people discuss that the contribution agreement that Hashicorp makes people sign gives them the right to change the license for existing contributions, but I'm not a lawyer so I really couldn't say for certain either way.
AWS has had a Terraform competitor for a long time; CloudFormation. I'm not sure how much they contribute to Terraform, some I think, but most of the AWS provider for Terraform to my knowledge is developed and owned by Hashicorp. If AWS just stopped contributing to Terraform development, I think it would have effectively zero difference.
This is kind cool. Closer than the Reflex thing to what I think would be cool. I wonder if anybody has made any kind of Python/Django system that lets you just write the front-end stuff in React but handles all the state synchronization stuff between React and your Python server.
The pull out fridge doesn't even seem that great, I just think of shit sliding off the back or you push them in and then you push everything off the front.
I do, yes. It'd also be nice to know things like state of charge/how much gas I got, whats the car temperature now - tell me when it reaches X, look at my car's cameras. There are plenty of compelling use-cases.
"Authorized parts" and "Authorized repair centers only" would be allow them to extract massive profits while providing no consumer benefit. That then incentivizes them to create even more fragile, unreliable vehicles.
There is no simple and secure technical reason car makers can't do this, they just want to fight it because they make tons of money off making fragile cars, charging exorbitant fees at their dealers service department and for parts, and they see MA's Right to Repair bill as a threat to their revenue stream and how much they can extract from customers while providing no value back to them.
They couldn't care less about being the ones developing games, but they DO care very much about being the ones driving productivity apps which opens a whole corporate world for them to control.
>Hybrids are strictly worse than electrics in every measure except range, and most customers do not need the range they claim to need.
Thats the benefit of a plug-in Hybrid. Most people don't need to drive much on a day to day basis and the smaller battery can handle that fine. For longer driving you have the ICE engine. The ICE engine can weigh as much or less than a comparatively "long range" battery.
But they're very closely related. A complex item is going to have a more complex manufacturing process than a simple item. Have you ever seen how big an aircraft factory is?
Daytona floor jacks, good stuff. Icon tools pretty much one step below Mac/Snap on. Cable Porter, Warrior, etc. brand well its cheap and disposable. Pittsburg - well you're buying brass brushes so you use em once and throw em in the fuckit bucket. The names they give stuff do a good job indicating what the quality is.
Yeah he had funny delivery but the COVID conspiracy shit just made me think "is this guy actually saying anything useful or is he just saying it in a funny way?" Was pretty clear it was just the latter.
Yeah there are people who are talking about blah blah blah cloud complexity and how on-prem is some panacea. What they're really getting at is "why go through all this trouble to setup autoscaling groups and load balancers when I'm perfectly fine running things on a single Pentium II whitebox sitting in my closet?" It doesn't seem to occur to them that although that might work _for them_ the whole reason we go through this labor is we need MORE than that.