24,425 karma · joined April 15, 2016
- Solid, Tim Berners-Lee's new set of standards that aims to give people control over their data. See https://solidproject.org
- Plaudit, a project aimed at making more research freely available. (This is why you will often see me showing up in threads about Open Access.) See https://plaudit.pub
Blog: https://vincenttunru.com
Mastodon: https://fosstodon.org/@VincentTunru
Email: djk48fyo0@mozmail.com
Source-available: source code available, but only for viewing, not to make derivatives.
Freeware/shareware: source code not available, but software is free to run.
Not sure what the weights equivalent of that last one is, but I feel like this is more like source-available.
> In all likelihood, GNOME OS Preview will be with us for a few years. However, we are explicitly not promising updates in perpetuity. If you’re not OK with re-installing your OS in a few years to switch to GNOME OS Stable, this is not for you yet. But if you’ve already been curious about giving GNOME OS a try, this is the moment!
I'm sceptical that that brought Flatpak top-of-mind however.
[1] https://blogs.gnome.org/adrianvovk/2026/10/16/gnome-os-previ...
Well, if you go further back in time, there were. It's not like introducing a nonnative species.
Of course this comment section also warrants a mention of Zen Browser, another Arc alternative that's been going for a while already, is based on Firefox, and is available cross-platform: https://zen-browser.app
(See also this almost identical conversation: https://phanpy.social/#/fosstodon.org/s/117281195620828803)
I assume you've heard of it, but just in case you haven't: you should try Zen! It's basically Arc, but based on Firefox, open source and, more importantly, actively maintained.
...
Note that the employees were not recognisable; their faces were blurred out.
(link timestamped to 29min, where the demo starts.)
And as I said in my first post, "Ask me again later" and the associated behaviour is annoying.
I was agreeing with you that indeed, I don't want software to bother me again with the question unprompted. Additionally, I appreciate the reassurance that the dialog isn't my last opportunity to set the setting (because sometimes that is the case).
So tl;dr: label the button "Not now", and don't prompt me again.
But we're comparing to the case where it just says "No", in which case "Not now" at least tells me I can look up how to change it later now - or more importantly, that I don't need to give this further thought now.
Yes, PMs (or anyone) making software doing dumb shit is dumb anyway, but that also holds true if it were labelled "No".
Only "ask me again later" is the one that prompts you again. That's why I do mind that one, and appreciate the other ones.
Yes, more text can be another way to provide the message, but if you've ever done any user testing, you'll know that people at best scan through your UI. I know I wouldn't read that, or at least would prefer not to have to read that.
I guess I don't see why "No" combined with "You can change this later in settings" is so much less offensive than "Not now".
Of course, it helps that infrastructure adjustments over the decades ensures that many people that don't need to be in cars, aren't in cars.
Just last week new stats came out [1] that library attendance by young people in the Netherlands is going up again, so possibly!
[1] https://nos.nl/artikel/2630399-meer-locaties-meer-bezoekers-...