Zecc

And a classical parody: https://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10...

That's peanuts compared to the typos in "tommorow", also in the FAQ.

Took me some time (heh), but I've finally "compelted" the game.

I really did enjoy the music.

You might be interested in hearing what Chucklefish, the creators of Starbound, have to say about Rust::

https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/78bowa/hey_this_is_ky...

https://www.rust-lang.org/static/pdfs/Rust-Chucklefish-White...

As do I, sort of. To subtract mentally I adjust the numbers of both sides by the same amount so it rounds up nicely in either side.

In this case I'd go:

    61-17 =>(-1 on both sides)=>
    60-16 =>(-10 on both sides)=>
    50-6 =>("normal" borrow)=>
    44  

Had it been, say 148-34, I could go either:

    148-34 =>(+2)=>
    150-36 =>(-6 with borrow)=>
    144-30 =>(-30)
    114  

 or most likely  

    148-34 =>(+2)=>
    150-36 =>(-30)=>
    120-6 =>(-6)
    114  

though in this simple case I'd just

    148-34 =>(set the 100 aside)=>
    48-34 =>(split digits)=>
    40-30 + 8-4 =
    10+4 =>(join digits again)=>
    14 =>(put the 100 back in)=>
    114

This is in line with answers that were given to the Math Exchange question. Edit: @srtjstjsj put it nicely when they call it "breaking apart".

> What is ajax

Server-side validation relying on JavaScript. You still have to wait for the server to respond, and now you need to implement UI to tell the user something is happening in the background. But at least you can start proactively validating before the user actually submits the form, so there's that.

It pisses me off to no end when software uses keyboard shortcuts like Ctrl+` or even just ~. These are simply unusable with my keyboard.

You probably got a more relevant result by searching for "E10s" than if you had searched for "Electrolysis", too.

Looking at the page's source code you can actually see the whole text there.

Thrice: inside the `content` attributes of `<meta property="og:description">`, `<meta itemprop="description">`, and `<meta name="twitter:description">`.

The `content`attribute of `<meta name="description">` is empty. A missed opportunity.

But think of the important reasons why this page requires JavaScript:

-

-

-

Source code is a structured serialization. And it also happens to be plain text.

Edit: or were you referring to data rather than logic?

I couldn't help noticing Gogs is hosted on GitHub...

  https://github.com/gogits/gogs

    let sql = `delete from order_lines`
            ` where order_id = ${orderId}`;

Without a lint complaining about a missing semicolon you wouldn't notice this bug.

This has happened to me with a rather more complex query.

> a song gets stuck in your head from lack of "closure".

I usually turn off my car's stereo only at the end of musical phrases for just this reason. This phenomenon happens a lot to me.

There is a song, stuck in my head since a little over a decade ago, which ends with a fade out, not providing any closure at all.

It still pops up occasionally, but fortunately I can usually override it by recalling any of a number of favorite other song loops I have collected through the years and haven't gotten tired of yet.

> http://patriciogonzalezvivo.com/2015/thebookofshaders/

is also available as the more memorable:

http://thebookofshaders.com/

> dd is the “copy and convert” command. The letters “dd” have nothing to do with what the tool actually does.

It dumps data.

I'm not the parent commenter and I'm not on a Mac, but I assume it's the bash glob for a single character match (much like * matches multiple characters, ? matches a single character). Which means the actual file path should be something like `/dev/rdisk0`.

Edit: oh, I guess you meant the ? in `bs=?M`, in which case I don't know. Probably damurdock's way of not committing to a particular value in their post.

They don't care about other people in the same room trying to concentrate on what they're doing?

FWIW, the Response object has the `ok` property [1] as a shorcut. It is equivalent to testing whether status is between 200 and 299.

If it's really that important to you, you can always create your own wrapper around fetch

    function fetch2(uri) {
       return fetch(uri).then( (res) => {
         if (res.ok) {
           return Promise.resolve(res);
         } else {
           return Promise.reject("Request failed with status "+res.status+" ("+res.statusText+")");
         }
       } );
    }

    fetch2('some-url')
      .then( (res) => {
       console.log('Success', res.status, res.statusText);
      })
      .catch( (err) => {
       console.log(err);
      });

  [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Response/ok

> In any case, it's never a good idea to question someone with a different set of abilities than you have with a "is it really that hard?" Their experience far outweighs your naive intuition about what's easy and hard for them.

Wise words, certainly. I apologize if my tone came across as condescending. I asked out of genuine curiosity, as I figured that someone who did not rely on their eyes could have a different, but not worse, perhaps even better understanding of space and spatial relations than someone who does (accounting for individuals being unique, and all that).

But perhaps I'm being blinded by my own eyes. After reading the article wlesieutre linked to, I believe it might be the case.

> I'm genuinely curious how you would think of three dimensional objects without ever being able to see them... [...] > without reference to anything you can see with your eyes, how would you describe space?

But the thing is: I wouldn't have to. People without sight live in space too. What mental models of the universe anyone has inside their head may vary wildly, but at the end of the day a torus is still torus-shaped when the lights are out, and West is to your right when you turn North while upside down.

Is it really that hard for a blind person to intuit geometry? I would have figured one does not require working eyes to understand space.

Seems like it's been "embrace, open source code" lately.

Am I the only one reminded of a certain energy drink?

The whole site is just a frame around http://mrgory.info/sm/

I wish we would stop beating around the bush and just add templating to HTML already; not as the current ‛template‛ element proposal, which still looks like DOM manipulation, but actual "expressions inside template attributes and content + data context set in code" like every templating library is doing. And don't forget conditionals and repeaters while you're at it.

> Take a look at Wagtail.io

Good grief. Thin white and black text on a red background. Why do you hate my eyes? Why??

No, it was Einstein. I looked it up.

I considered typing that, but went with "five totally random words phoropter".

Plus, I think they mention somewhere their whole long-time plan is to only license the architecture to third-party hardware manufacturers.