Strange comment. This doesn't sound like a legitimate criticism because of "Here is the official commit undoing the change:" being not a link to a commit to start with, and secondly being a declined pull request, and thirdly for the reality that `master` writes `ggjt` header.
Really looks like some axe-grinding here, if I'm being honest. Especially because it takes very little effort to find out what the present header is by someone who can write software.