_ache_

They can't compete, they have bills. By the end of the year, if they can't react, it's game over.

Maybe US clients could be a little patriotic here, but money is money. They won't give them free money forever.

https://hawk-sign.info/

PS: Never heard of LEA, looks like a Korean cryptography standard equivalent to AES. I don't know what was the previous best attack on it. Maybe weak or strong depending on that, since it's an attack on chosen-text.

You gotta catch-up or die.

Because bash is maybe worst than C for this task.

I suspect that this researchers work involves formalizing and proving the optimality of their solution.

https://github.com/TensorOne

I don't get the goal of the website. It's averted as a specification, but to spec what ?! Everything is sourced to another "source of truth".

A VPS with without a black listed IP is good. A simple rootless container, update is easy.

Configuration takes little time, not much.

I still hate that I have to double the bang to use the same bang as DDG.

Example: "!!wde Ente" to go to the German wikipedia page about duck instead of "!wde Ente" with DDG.

I'm sorry for Sophie.

You number, approximately right but means nothing and the link AC => Less deaths by Heat Wave isn't supported by any fact.

Others factors like percent of the population > 70y, difference between usual temp / mean temperature in an heat wave and access to fresh and clean water should be more correlated than "AC implantation per hundred inhab".

Moore law did its thing, now you can do it with a lot less computer power.

Or: https://dns.kitchen/jingle

I can't see how you rights to use AI is prevalent on the right of anybody to write the string "OpenClaw" or any string forbidden by your AI provider.

Seriously, if the author hides it and trick your AI agent to check it, well maybe. But otherwise, it's not even a question.

The problem is not (not only) that it told a 50 something guy someone is coming to kill him. The problem is the bond with the user.

Everyone is fallible; you just need to craft the right narrative. Obviously, been educated about what AI makes you less affected, ..., by AI only.

If tomorrow Antropic decide to charge you extra if you interact with someone who talked badly about them, I'm still in my right to talk shit about them.

I also replaced Radical with rustical, and I gained free push updates.

https://cal.rs/ and https://github.com/lennart-k/rustical

And if you wanna try it out. https://cal.ache.one/u/ache

But it's the law there. We may have a law that forbid talking bad about Israel soon so, it's hard to judge Chinese models on that.

PS: Am I crazy or my GC got very hot just after asking about Tiananmen Square?!!!

PPS: Reproducible. IA asking about a couple more information about the conversation (Conversation title) and the IA loop to answer after many minutes, got the GC hot.

https://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2026/04/17/comm...

I can't comment that flamingo.

The whole thing isn't a joke because of this. Technically, it's IPv4++ and that about it.

> Every manageable element in an IPv8 network is authorised via OAuth2 JWT tokens

What ?!

I'm not sure it's the path I want to follow.

It's obvious to any non native english speaker, when you have a spam in english, it is because they toke the email from the web. When it's in you native language, it's usually from a data breach.

I'm vastly more spammed by the later. I can confirm it with unique email addresses of the "+" form (but not with the + character).

Also when I'm spammed in english, it's for Web3 crypto stuff and from a data breach it's a phishing attempt.

The data-source are the enormous data breach that are more and more frequent. There is more intensive to collect more information on someone you already know something about than spamming an email you don't even know if it's a valid one.

The spam can also be very more effective as it present itself with personal information about the spammed.