HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

_bender_

10 karma · joined May 15, 2020

submissionscomments
_bender_··on Just turning your phone on qualifies as searching it, court rules
Many scholars are arguing that browsing history will require a warrant after Carpenter. For example, see Paul Ohm's article: https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/assets/articlePDFs/v32/32HarvJL...

The recent act by Congress does not mean it is actually legal to access browsing history without a warrant. It will be interesting to follow the development of this issue through the courts.

_bender_··on FBI cannot even look at your phone lock screen without a warrant, rules judge
You're right, it would need to be appealed. The defendant would not appeal, but the government could, and likely will if it views this as a significant burden to police practice. An important thing to note is that federal district court decisions are not binding on other federal district courts (the decisions are persuasive authority, but do not force another judge's hands). Any other judge could decide not to follow this rule. Only if the rule is announced by the 9th circuit would district courts in the 9th circuit have to follow the rule.

My main point is that while this is a promising decision, it is very far from the law of the land. And, as the original commenter pointed out, even if the 9th circuit upholds this ruling, the 9th circuit is only one circuit among many, and is often viewed as the most liberal circuit and not necessarily representative of the federal judiciary as a whole.

_bender_··on FBI cannot even look at your phone lock screen without a warrant, rules judge
I don't agree with everything the commenter is saying but they are pointing out that the Western District Court of Washington is a federal district court under the 9th Circuit's jurisdiction, so for this new rule to have significant weight it would need to be affirmed by the 9th Circuit