> PriceRunner is considered to have suffered damage as a result of Google having illegally favoured its price comparison service for many years
Why would Google NOT favor it's own service at it's own product? How is that illegal?
72 karma · joined November 26, 2020
Why would Google NOT favor it's own service at it's own product? How is that illegal?
What is this, rage bait? It's bullshit, and insulting to actual security researchers.
That might be true for low-effort vulnerabilities and fake security researchers, but the real security researchers are far from being replaced by LLMs.
Who is the target audience for your books? Is it founders? Or is it for people who want to be founders?
To takedown something that is infringing your brand, you would have to spend time and money dealing with bureaucratic procedures.
It seems like he's having a database for each app.
> 30 MySQL databases (248 GB of data)
> 34 Nginx virtual hosts across multiple domains
> GitLab EE (42 GB backup)
> Neo4J Graph DB (30 GB graph database)
> Supervisor managing dozens of background workers
> Gearman job queue
> Several live mobile apps serving hundreds of thousands of users
I'm not against vertical scaling and stuff, but 30 db instances in one server is just crazy.
TikTok is a social media app, and it gets heavily abused as it is.
Don't know what they're using for sending emails, but that's something that should be handled by their email service provider, unless they're hosting their own email servers.
But seriously, $300M valuation for a CLI tool that adds some metadata to Git commits. I don't know what to say.
What a weird joke of a company is this.
The closest thing to an alternative office suite from an European company is Proton, and even that is barely a replacement.