1,156 karma · joined April 12, 2019
git commit --amend --no-edit && git push -fTradFi entities now have the ability to pick what they like out of the mix and offer that to customers while also benefiting from the convenience of trust assumptions, something cryptocurrency eschews. TradFi is building atop thousands of years worth of UX improvements in how people can come to trust each other. It's difficult for cryptocurrency to compete there.
I still love the developer convenience of blockchain since it nicely combines serverless with auth with payments. But for the most part, given the existence of trust, these benefits could also come from a system like in TFA having a Wasm runtime and maybe a dash of WebAuthn. Like a mashup of Cloudflare Workers and Stripe.
RLHF is a scourge.
The “even if it’s the centralized version” is an acknowledgement that some users may prefer centralization, or the platform is still too young to usefully decentralize. As long as there is a way out, or a credible plan, freedom is preserved.
The third Matrix succeeded due to choice—even at the subconscious level.
There’s also a musig2 one by the same author.
The site guidelines suggest not accusing posts of being written by bots :(
I'd always been hoping to do a startup, having read all of the varying experiences here. The opportunity arose during the EthDenver hackathon where I hacked up a winning proof of concept. The decision to set off was easy since I felt if I didn't at least try to make secure serverless for web3 work, I'd regret never taking the opportunity.
So far, with ChatGPT as my legal and marketing assistant, things are progressing and I remain optimistic about controversial things like trusted hardware, blockchain, and human-AI interaction. Actually, what I would really love is an AutoGPT for bizdev if anyone has that...
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/sibling
> share (v.) To have or use in common
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/share
> another (det.) Not the same; different
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/another
Being one’s own sibling is incompatible with the accepted definitions, so no.
Update: closing and reopening the windows puts them back into normal mode. Apparently the little close buttons in the sidebar still work (along with the rest of the window). Really weird...
For your sleeping proposal, it sounds a little like differential privacy [1] where you can add some randomness to gain some privacy but spend some of the predetermined privacy budget. In that case, `N` depends on the (roughly) variance of the computation time, the noise amount, and your privacy budget. If you get it right, it has provable security properties. However, that doesn't work as well when the adversary has access to the machine and can observe the intermediate state (or side channel leaks thereof).
[0]: https://github.com/dalek-cryptography/subtle
[1]: https://blog.openmined.org/privacy-series-basics-definition/