32 karma · joined October 16, 2018
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenjiro_Takayanagi
'Although he failed to gain much recognition in the West, he built the world's first all-electronic television receiver, and is referred to as "the father of Japanese television"'
He presented it in 1926 (Farnsworth in 1927)
However father of television was this dude:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manfred_von_Ardenne
Better resolution, wireless transmission and Olympics 1936
If you navigated here, it's because the previous request experienced an error. If you are the site owner, you can use the Translate Error String tool to investigate this further. This is located on the control center under: Hamburger menu > SUPPORT > Edge Diagnostics.
---------
interesting.
Site is unusable.
it can be found here: https://www.autohotkey.com/board/topic/30102-how-can-i-parse...
it consists of some 30ish lines of code and 67 lines with comments and usage example
smilingcat.jpg
Think of a pond with a smooth undisturbed surface. Now, define two spots as center, and for each spot in the exact same distance a point of measurement.
Here it comes: now drop two identical balls of steel into the pond at the very same time and do your measurement. You will detect that the waves on the surface of the pond are perfectly the same.
The entanglement is - simply spoken - just a syncronizing of the particles, hence the reason why they "seem" to behave the same.
typeof null === "object" language consstency etc
but hey, let's add more syntax sugar
edit: typo
think of firefox. you start it and it "lives" in the memory of the computer. however, turned off it is gone. the process is eliminated and purged from memory. when restarted, however, it remembers your browser history, sessions and passwords. still it is a new process.
basically this is what happens each night when we sleep. every morning a new you wakes up.
so when a cloned asset of cross linked (aka relational) memories is spinned up, the resulting process does not have a distinct possibility to determine if it is being cloned. it just have it same associative pathways in its wetware as the original. yet it will believe being the original and also act accordingly. when you ask outsiders who know you, they wont be able to make out a difference, and label the clone as original. the clone (depending on the age of the information) will also believe it is original as it knows your passwords, your mental setup (and lives by that because of reasons) and it remembers whatever has happened to you, too.
this can only mean one thing: our so called consciousness is a fake conclusion. yes, cogito ergo sum, but only for the moment. new day, new me.
IEEE 802.11bf will happen, because we allow it to happen and after it has been established everywhere for some questionable reasons everybody is looking like a suprised Pikachu when stuff like this is being abused.
True dat. However since there is not a single valid definition for intelligence, I started to speak and think of heuristics when others are referring to intelligence. As long as any traits can be learned and trained their testing has nothing to do with what I'd call intelligence.
i guess the author must be stupid. /s
This is an invitation to silence unwanted users by certain governments.