628 karma · joined July 13, 2020
The internet just keeps giving.
Isn't every song recorded as every word singularly at a certain pitch? And timing done completely in the DAW instead of while recording.
Barely was singing when a friend of mine did ``professional'' recording, and had to know each pitch of a song to perfection, since no overlap was ever sung.
But not always: if zero is not on the bar chart, e.g. log(y(x)) with [x] = Kelvin, such a plot will of course not work. So keep temperature as temperature increment over pre-industrial times or other baseline.
Also, does coastal nitrogen have three data points, or why the edge in the middle? Scatter charts plus trend are more the real thing than a curve if this is two linear relationships, with a second slope after a certain time, and keep y(x) plotting here, of course.
That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.
(Minor spoilers for The Expanse, word Protomolecule means something there.)
Okay, now no one can add numbers at scale since Excel exists and calculates at the accuracy limits of a counter-top calculator. But in theory, spreadsheets can be intelligent solving tools.
wait, we need more than one future ruler of earth? Won't any two Skynets fight each other for control, which is why the US want to be first, not second, after PRC?
aka (just) anti-aliasing, we are talking original quake 1 era, after all.
Then we got GPUs to say "This thing is closer to a CPU by now".
Then those were recoined into GPGPU, as in general purpose GPU, when CUDA became an important feature and again to say "This thing is closer to a CPU by now".
``` KEY ACTION N , SPACE Next slide P , Shift SPACE Previous slide ← , H Navigate left → , L Navigate right ↑ , K Navigate up ↓ , J Navigate down Alt + ←/↑/→/↓ Navigate without fragments Shift + ←/↑/→/↓ Jump to first/last slide B , . Pause F Fullscreen G Jump to slide ESC, O Slide overview
```
The idea would be that you should not fiddle with the minds who try to independently evaluate your works, so that is not a feasible approach to truth seeking.
While in organic chemistry, this way, valid progress was made, you can always avoid a perpetuum mobile inventor and get conned.
We do credit architects with buildings, and the actual builders don't get a say in copyright of the fascade or naming the final thing.
> You are a poo-emoji bomb-emoji #!! driver
?
Asymmetric synthesis was already well established before 1995. Chemists like Knowles, Noyori, Sharpless, and Evans could routinely produce highly enantioenriched molecules using chiral catalysts or auxiliaries.
What made Soai's reaction different was that it did not require an external chiral source. The chiral product catalyzes its own formation, so a tiny random imbalance can be amplified into a very large enantiomeric excess.
Other examples of abiotic asymmetry, such as Pasteur's crystallization experiments and circularly polarized light, were also known earlier.
So the Nobel press release is best understood as shorthand: Soai did not discover asymmetric synthesis, but demonstrated a remarkable form of self-amplifying, spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in an abiotic chemical system.
If it bears fruits and we build ``it'', everyone dies, which is par, also?