997 karma · joined April 14, 2014
isn't this a bit reductive?
that seems like a false dichotomy. you behave as cruel and abusive as you do because it's within you to behave that way.
oh. it would seem this is more about you feeling impressed with yourself, rather than making substantive arguments.
i though rust has been stable since 1.0. am i wrong?
plus this arrangement would seem vulnerable to a pathological case where you found the V from the db, but have a full/failed/partitioned cache and end up faulting or otherwise not returning the V.
i'm unconvinced... a broken leg isn't a normal biological function, while (afaik) pain is an entirely internal process that is a 'response' mechanism.
> Sometimes things go wrong and the result is pain. There is no purpose to it; it just happened. Not everything has an evolutionary purpose.
the ostensible purpose of 'some' pain is to cause you to stop or avoid doing something damaging, or being aware of a need to seek remedy. for those few people who don't feel any physical pain (congenital analgesia)... life is actually more dangerous.
when it comes to incapacitating levels of pain, things seem to get murky. there is some arguable benefit to adopting a protective posture (covering a wound, adopting a fetal position, etc) to mitigate further harm... but it seems these same behaviors can also increase risk of harm as well, especially when it comes to pain causing reduced situational awareness and other reasoning impairments.
then what is 'close to AI'?
> You folks should read the urban meaning of orthogonal
nope, nope, nope. that site's a hive of scum and villainy, and a massive number of entries are just random nonsense.
i'd rather go to wiktionary[0], which includes:
"Of two or more problems or subjects, independent of or irrelevant to each other."
afaict, they asked about the impact to the linux build of filezilla (not about alternatives).
are rsync and scp strict supersets of filezilla's features?
you did not include "so much that if it goes down it would cause a prod outage" in your quote, which is why the strawman claim was put forth.
postmodernism just refers to a movement that came into existence (or at least into fashion) after modernism. it's at least as old as the 50s or 60s.
(that may not be entirely fair, i guess i just tend to be skeptical of people who get hung up on languages.)
from what i can discern of your position, i would estimate that your views are harmful. i can sleep fine not agreeing with you.
that said, this seems like it could potentially be a thought-terminating cliché:
> The problem is that complex topics are complex.