164 karma · joined September 5, 2011
I'd argue that when targeting the same number of bits of entropy the XKCD method is still easier to remember than a bunch of fully random characters.
[1] https://thinkprogress.org/does-nuclear-power-have-a-negative...
There was a post here a while ago (that I cannot find anymore) about the devs of a package manager of sorts who were asked kindly by Github to do something about their excessive data usage. So it's probably not a good idea to build a company on it.
Data traffic is already measured and priced accordingly in AWS so that's not something new for Lambda.
[1] http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/cloud/cloud-management/cloud...
Just to add to this, I found the blog post he mentions[1] towards the bottom that supports this conclusion a really good read.
[1] http://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2015/02/01/what-color-is-y...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_packet#Fixed_header
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#Simplified_processing_by_...
It means you do not need to think about x instances that serve your API anymore. You just upload your Lambda function, wire some API path to it and pay per request. For smaller APIs this will be probably be negligible. Could be a gamechanger!
"And, hey, if he's the Democratic nominee, I’m going to end up voting for him."
So while in the primaries he might vote for someone else, in the general he will vote for the person responsible for a lot of the issues described in the article. which is quite saddening but understandable.
You can move a lot of bandwidth for sure but as soon as you start using droplets or linodes for the sole intent of using its' included bandwidth (to self-build a CDN on it for example) you'll be shut down in no time.
http://blogs.esa.int/andre-kuipers/2012/05/15/ik-pas-nog-in-...
(dutch article) http://www.volkskrant.nl/vk/nl/2672/Wetenschap-Gezondheid/ar...