afiori

A lot of the bitching about react always had the same flavour of the complaints that JavaScript dares to have a NaN

To be fair it is stupid that NaN !== NaN but that is how IEEE and CPUs made floats to be

JavaScript's execution model uses cooperative concurrency to avoid a tons of data races, preemptive non-parallel concurrency would make all web development incredibly harder

C++ and python are exactly where I would expect this problem to come up

True, but in a sense a single frontier model of today would be of incredible historical significance in the far away future.

Sure but each of them is being priced as if each one is gonna have 90% marketshare in the future.

Markets and rationality are sometimes just acquaintances

For a lot of people writing prose is a chore

> (2) There is nothing actually forcing the open source release.

the anti-cloud-use license would include it, with no need of a separate release

I cannot answer your main question, but i can give you recommendations wrt what you are gonna try to do.

Very likely there will be a lot of parts of the app you are not going to understand, those will be the main problems so help claude help itself.

Make it add diagnostic/event-logs to every part of the stack and potentially even design implementations around traceability (eg avoid batch background processes that touch many flows if possible). so that claude can check whether runtime behaviour matches expectations. also store historical data to help debug regressions.

Treat implementations as cattle not pets, once a feature is done consider scapping it and turning it into a design doc, then ask claude to reimplement interactively with you step by step explaining to you what is going to do, why it matters, etc. this is a very good way to minimize the black boxes you don't understand in the app.

if the app is web make it work very well with playwright for e2e ux tests.

finally i like the architecture given in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KvbVq3Eg5w (use ui composition to define feature) but this has little to do with claude

An Oxford comma before the or would make it clearer maybe

you are right a stack of printed qr codes is better

Yes, but i cannot create a robot that can get married, people do not have the right to give personhood to tools

Woke activists love the word "systemic" for a reason.

If a bunch of good people acting in good faith produce a result an evil mastermind would want does it matter if they are good? On many levels obviously yes, on some practical levels the system and the incentives still need to change.

Weirdly I think humans should have more rights than machines

A legislative solution to Flock seems a lot more feasible than one for literacy

Most uses of .env files are for apps or containers imho, so you could just have a .env file in each folder and configure docker compose /node / whatever to pick it up

courtesy of chatgpt there is also this abomination

    ht tp://[\x00::gg]\t/foo\nbar/%/%QZ/%F?q=<\"|{}>##

% characters must be escaped in URIs at the very least, and _ is not valid in domains

also this one is valid too for the regex

    %_%://%_%.%_%/%_%?%_%#%_%

Also the more companies go in this direction the more "soft power" the EU has on the topic

The elitism of direct democracy is a mystery to me, especially in the case of the US where it is not technically direct and the powers and role of the president are deeply modelled after those of the British crown of the times

> well-formed URI

A parser that assumes the input to be already valid is usually not enough for most applications

according to that regex this is a valid url

__..__..%%%zz..

I would guess that the film was still mastered/produced digitally

you can, but many of those repair can be delicate and require specialized equipment.

The difference between the 2 requirements is the level of technical knowledge needed and the necessary investment in tools

IMO most of these appointments should be done by congress itself, the only reason they are done by the executive is because the role of president was a created on the template of the role of king.

except that without a "prime minister" now there is no separation between the "king" and the fulcrum of political power.

as the term rule of law suggest the legislative branch has the power to make the rules

IMO they entire law should have been target at "replaceable by independent professionals", it is reasonable to require industry standard professional equipment for opening and working on a phone

I think many companies believe they own their cloud hosted DBs

it would be sorta enough to bundle the wasm binary

yes but no... most database allow for at least as many parallel and concurrent writes as there are tables at a minimum.

The "lock on write" problem is that in MySQL i could run a OLAP pipeline for a few hours and have a fully functioning database with degraded perfomance, on SQLite the same pipeline would lock the database for the full hour. (there are surely ways to solve this (eg using the main db as read-only and a secondary db for writes or splitting the writes in incremental transaction), but it is not a "myth".

What I mean is that unsafe code allows you to eg break std invariants (set invalid length to Vec, unlock a locked mutex, etc.) in ways that can be UB, which of these are UB and which can be used "safely" is sort of unknown.

For better or worse they are much more well understood in C as they are front and center of the language semantics