261 karma · joined December 15, 2024
The field experiments in this study are a few years old.
When the user shares it, that is when reputational harm becomes an issue.
I'm not sure what the original commenter had in mind, but just because our machines are idle when we aren't using them doesn't mean that, that's how we will use computers in the future.
I think notifications are an example even now of the computer not really being idle when we aren't interacting with it.
Genuinely curious which part you found complex.
You can build solar panels practically anywhere with enough daylight. Space data centers will never make any sense and it's clearly bait for people who will believe anything.
Ironically this is a great example of the gambler's fallacy.
Plenty of useful things get free passes to be dangerous. Traffic accidents are the leading cause of accidental deaths in 11 states, but we don't ban cars because they're dangerous. There's plenty of safety features, but we acknowledge and accept that people will die. People like to pretend that they won't sacrifice safety for convenience, but they continue to do it time and time again.