"It's against the law so no you can't" isn't going to work with EVERY 14 year old. But it will work for many and hopefully that's enough.
317 karma · joined November 7, 2011
"It's against the law so no you can't" isn't going to work with EVERY 14 year old. But it will work for many and hopefully that's enough.
This is about moving these techniques further down the chain. A robot picker arm with a few cameras attached that can tell whether something is rotten is well within our grasp. (Awful pun intended!)
(But your point still stands, of course.)
I think if you try posit a canonical definition of the word 'Hacking' here, you're going to have a bad time. The community decides the relevance by voting.
> The status quo is established by the actions of large-scale corporate and political actors
Then isn't it important for people to learn about the status quo? Especially given it's moving so fast. Without this article I would have probably considered a startup doing the same to be cutting-edge, disruptive and most definitely 'hacking'. Now we all know where the bar is set.
I agree that it's a lot of work and wouldn't be unfair to seek some compensation.
A commoditised battery/drivetrain solution allows the incumbents to focus on what they do best - building high quality cars at scale. So in this respect the challenge lies with Tesla.
(FWIW I'm a huge Tesla fan but I enjoy reading EV articles on HN because the discourse is a bit more balanced than more pro-Tesla communities.)
Yes. If we could let people relate their experience as customers without giving unwanted relationship advice that'd be great.
Really, you've got to hand it to them. And I have to agree it's not a fault to be sensitive to the judgement of your peers.
Of course the term 'blacks' is, certainly to the college-educated and those living in California and New York, very un-politically correct. I can appreciate such an audience would be moved to call her out that point rather than engaging with what she's actually saying.
Also, you linked to a parts list. This automatically excludes most people who don't have the knowledge or motivation to assemble their own computer.
To do this they require access to high-resolution (spatial and temporal) rain radar data, which isn't universally available. (In the USA this is provided by the NOAA, in the UK by the Met Office.)
Whilst it might be valid that you could launch a more-effective-in-aggregate fleet of rovers for the cost of a manned mission, I'm still a huge proponent of getting people out there to have a look around.
Has anybody tried asking up front what the average number of days actually taken is? And if you asked and then took the job - were they telling the truth?
I believe that, in Europe at least, these restrictions are due to be relaxed, so we'll start seeing more aerodynamic trucks in the coming years.