187 karma · joined February 3, 2014
I actually send the HN discussion itself to my Reading List. So when I find some time I start with the comments here and then decide whether or not I should read the article. And tbf most of the times I get enough information here and never follow the link to the main reading.
[0]: https://github.com/almata/BlogGit/blob/master/README.md
Remote: YES
Willing to relocate: Nope, although I can be onsite 3 days a week (main European cities)
Technologies: iOS
LinkedIn: https://ie.linkedin.com/in/almata
Email: mata.albert (Gmail)
Does this work for you? I mean, do you get more constructive criticism using this? I tend to think in real life we are programmed to agree with our managers most of the time. Have you received more sincere feedback when you start saying this?
It seems no algorithm there taught you more useful things though.
Screenshots every 10 minutes? You mean... screenshots of MY SCREEN every 10 minutes? That was what made me close their website and totally forget it until I've seen this submission on HN today.
I once implemented it in typical scenario where sales people had to look for a client, but it could be written as: 1/ That Client With A Strange Name, Ltd. 2/ The Client With Strange Name, Ltd. 3/ That Client With A Strange Name 4/ [etc]
It worked really well and avoided lots of duplicated entries.
All lessons are interesting and all ideas can be valuable, but in this kind of articles I always find that the most valuable advice is just this: be persistent, don't give up. I'd say this is usually the key for success in many areas of knowledge (and certainly in programming).