1,065 karma · joined February 26, 2022
Not correct. Fuel for private aviation is taxed, including jet fuel and avgas. However, there are very few "private" jets, most are operated by some company, and therefore not private. Jet-A1 for a truely privately operated C172 with a diesel engine is taxed.
That's a pretty convincing use-case. Why use something standard if it can be non-standard custom instead!
Nuclear option is not likely to be used for some "minor" conflict like that, because it would go both ways quickly.
I would love to live a carbon-neutral live, but giving up on flying - no way. An easy choice compared to those at war.
Bader willingly reentered the airforce, putting his life at risk, just to be able to fly.
On the German side, to get to fly at least prentend to be a Nazi. Without that, no flying.
Sacrifices have to be made to get airborn.
Who is guilty for tracking users? The site relying an income from ads with user-tracking, or the company buying the ads based on tracking instead of some less invasive method of distribution?
With all invoices going through government computers, only VAT that has actually been paid can be claimed back.
The easier solution would of course be to get rid of VAT, and increase income tax instead. But then people earning barely enough will suddenly notice how much the are paying. VAT nicely hides that fact.
"6. The OBM systems installed by the manufacturer in the vehicles shall be capable of: [...] (b) communicating data on exhaust emission performance and battery durability data of the vehicle via the OBD port, including for the purpose of roadworthiness tests in accordance with Directive 2014/45/EU and technical roadside inspections in accordance with Directive 2014/47/EU, and anonymously over the air for the purpose of monitoring compliance of vehicle types;"
[0] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELE...
I'm using the RSS feeds, so I'm not sure...
Should they indeed be replaced, it's a hardeware problem. But by adding computer controled (depeding on sunlight conditions) tinted light bulbs it can be fixed in software.
Oh, you are lucky. Where I work that's the person who defines how to test and which tools to use. Look at the code, create tests to paint everything green. Whether the code actually works does not matter. I don't think these tests have ever caught any kind of bug. That isn't even their purpose.
> So I don’t even know who to blame here.
Money. If tests can be written without understanding what the code is supposed to do, they can be written by people who do not understand. Which appears to be the cheapest way to get passing tests. Not to find any bugs, but that's not what the process requires.
The underlying problem that makes it tempting to promote cheap music is the flat rate.
I write a mail (usually subject only) to myself. Actually, to noone, because my mobile devices Bcc myself. The notes are accessible from any device I can access my mailbox with, with no additional tools or servers for note keeping needed.
As soon as having learned some relative pitch, it becomes very difficult to train absolute pitch. One single note a day. For the second note the brain will switch to relative mode, and there's no progress on absolute. Forcing the ear/brain to run in absolute mode seems possible, but is difficult consistently enough to practice absolute.
Source: Experimenting with my own ability (or lack thereof).