I used to be a wild beast, I still am, but I used to be too.
192 karma · joined September 9, 2020
I used to be a wild beast, I still am, but I used to be too.
Citation needed.
*The CDC directly refutes this claim.
> The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducts national surveillance to better understand the causes of pregnancy-related deaths. The Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS) defines a pregnancy-related death as a death during or within 1 year of the end of pregnancy from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy. Medical epidemiologists review and analyze applicable vital records, and additional available data from all 50 states, New York City, and Washington, DC. Beginning in 2020, data from Puerto Rico are included, and in 2021, data from Northern Mariana Islands are included in PMSS.
https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-mortality/php/pregnancy-mortali...
A copyright holders tort is with the infringing distributor, not the end user.
It seems that all of the big players in the industry are perfectly fine with disallowing output that infringes on copyright.
An artist, writer, whoever, could read all the copyrighted material in the world, even pirated material, unless their output is a copy or copyrighted artifact, then there is no infringement.
Commissioned work is owned by the commissioner unless otherwise agreed upon by contract.
So long as the work is not distributed, exhibited, performed, etc, as in the example of keeping the artwork on their refrigerator in their home, then no infringement has taken place.
If I use a copy machine to reproduce your copyrighted work, I am responsible for that infringement not Xerox.
If I coax your novel out of my phones keyboard suggestion engine letter by letter, and publish it, it’s still me infringing on your copyright.
If I make a copy of your clip art in Illustratator, is Adobe responsible? Etc.
Employers, state and local governments, businesses open to the public, commercial facilities, transportation providers, etc, are required to procure ADA compliant appliances where applicable.
The comment you’re replying to is correct in its usage.
Something done systematically is typically done explicitly and intentionally. This may be what the author of the article was implying, but the comment was pointing out that miscounting of the population due to an inability to perform the task is not systematic by definition.
"What giants?" asked Sancho Panza.
"The ones you can see over there," answered his master, "with the huge arms, some of which are very nearly two leagues long."
"Now look, your grace," said Sancho, "what you see over there aren't giants, but windmills, and what seems to be arms are just their sails, that go around in the wind and turn the millstone."
"Obviously," replied Don Quixote, "you don't know much about adventures."
I’ve been barking up this tree for nearly a decade.
>•..
>•..
>•Not provide a user interface for sending messages. Devices do not support sending messages using MAP.
From: “Accessory Design Guidelines for Apple Devices” [0]
[0] https://www.bluetooth.com/wp-content/uploads/attachments/Blu...
The symmetry is uuugh.
UM.. KNOCK KNOCK..
who’s there..
COBAL..
cobal who..?
COBBALISTS ARE DRIVING ME NUTS HAHAHA..