alternize

i really would love to see a one-card-for-all tho that supports chip + nfc, but my understanding is that card issuers are eager to ensure that this will not happen.

what would be the next steps to actually expose this django container to the public via port 80 and surviving a host server reboot?

  error_reporting = E_ALL & ~E_DEPRECATED & ~E_STRICT & ~E_NOTICE
  expose_php = Off
  log_errors = On
  display_errors = On
  display_startup_errors = On
  date.timezone = 'Europe/Somecity'
  magic_quotes_gpc = Off
  max_file_uploads = 256
  max_input_vars = 10000
  post_max_size = 296M
  upload_max_filesize = 256M
  session.cache_limiter = ''
  
  opcache.enable=1
  opcache.memory_consumption=128
  opcache.interned_strings_buffer=8
  opcache.max_accelerated_files=4000
  opcache.revalidate_freq=30
  opcache.fast_shutdown=1
  opcache.enable_cli=0

"Although this new version of Iconic will be commercial, it's important to state that the current open source version of Iconic will remain freely available."

so the version for which the kickstarter runs will be a new, commercial version:

- with a price >$70

- based/derived on the existing opensource iconic

- the icons in the opensource version will receive an update if they are also in the new commercial version

what i really miss tho is what kind of commercial license the backers/buyers receive for their backing.

   $.get("/static/pgpkey", function (key) { 
      // store key
      // hook to submit button click event & encrypt before submit
   });

what i got from the article is this: due to the financial situation of the owner, a small unpaid tax turns due to unfair practizes into a larger debt of like $5000, which then allowed a judge to enforce the sale of the house so that unpaid taxes could be paid off.

now if the house was sold for the mentioned 197'000, does that mean that the owner at least got the proceeds minus the debt? the title suggests that this would not be the case...

i found the colors to be rather distracting and not helpful. the results of two tests taken seem to agree with that.

[0] http://michael.otacoo.com/postgresql-2/postgres-9-3-feature-... [1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/queries-table-expr...

when you have to support multiple thousands employees, having a stable environment is key. upgrading becomes an expensive and slow process.

the next load set at that company is currently in testing for the last 9 months (!) and will upgrade to ie9 and office 2010 - both will be around for a few years to come, their extended support periods end in 2020.

now i wonder if i should have pestered a bit more, i.e. by demanding the release of the possible stored data (which definitely exists seeing the "please join"-spam from some years ago) in writing through snail mail. anyone had any success with that?