1,490 karma · joined March 13, 2009
the gov or court was never a part of ATC union negotiation, until they decided that a legal(explicitly legal, defined, upheld in courts) strike was illegal.
what they did to a union who can protest the decision? they formally decertified it.
thats wrong in so many directions, not only in legal system favoring one side, not having a council between the parties, but also ill-defined sharp response, as well as showing that gov dont need any base to dissolve(formally - discertify) any union organization? and all this without formal involvement of the POTUS?
i thought i understood the values and boundaries of local legal system. turns out i'm lost.
the part you never adressed is that government was not SUPPOSED to EVER get a favorite in a private conflict, part firing employees and banning them from ever serving for any gov posision? not only intent was so outrageous, but the reaction was disproportional, not only affecting more than 10K people, but leaving the whole industry barely hanging.
maybe the time will forget the outcome, but what I and prob the generations to come will never understand - what whas the gov stake in this? why they never tried to have a council with a gov as a mediator and most importantly - what is the value of at-will contracts if mostly works only one way?
Vultr also seems to be affected https://status.vultr.com/#LHR
Power seems to be slowly brought back
its just a gimmick to call their loyalty points "miles", they can call it "tokens" with same success, as they are have no relation to miles whatsoever.
What a great point for lose people reading the article; from the first sentence.
1) check that our MTA is up to date 2) check that we got fail2ban rules for POP&SMTP failed logins 3) use a haproxy and ban by subnet/country
128gb dimms are more than double the price of 64gb dimms, so it not always economically viable unless you need max memory density.