1,673 karma · joined May 4, 2015
They interview people they come across, and collect small and honest stories of people's lives. The show has been going for a long time, and they consistently manage to find heartwarming little stories in places you wouldn't expect to find them, with nothing but kindness and attention. One of my favourites so far was at a coin-operated hot ramen vending machine at the side of a road. The English narration is pretty cheesy, but I suppose it's part of the style.
You can watch the most recent episode here: https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/tv/72hours/
For archives and discussion, have a look into https://www.reddit.com/r/NHKWorldFans/.
An emulator is just an API-compatible device. It is legal to make and sell an emulator. It can be used for playing legit and pirated copies of games, just as the original console can. It's a healthy form of competition (like between PC manufacturers), resulting in better performing hardware for the consumer.
The comment you're replying to doesn't mention or defend piracy. They're only saying Nintendo's Switch hardware is lacking so people are searching for a better performing alternative, and Nintendo is using anti-competitive legal trickery to suppress alternatives, instead of improving their product.
If people do that, it means their recommendation algorithm's watch time and retention metrics get bad data; users aren't actually assessing how good the video is, but assessing previous viewers' assessment of it, so you get signal feedback.
If someone can get a good snowball effect going by brigading a bunch of dislikes on a video, they can reduce its reach even if the algorithm is showing it to people just as much. And it can snowball the other way too; people watching a long video a bit more hoping it will get good eventually because it has such a high ratio of likes.
Just speculating of course.
If you disagree with maintainer priorities, just fork it! Merge whatever you want, advertise your fork in the unmerged PRs' comments, see what happens. Nobody will be offended; the license specifically encourages this.
Maybe you'll find you're just better at this maintainer thing and the world now contains better software, or maybe after a few years you'll find that you understand their perspective.
> Unlike most DNS resolvers, 1.1.1.1 does not sell user data to advertisers.
Putting aside the question of whether they actually honour that commitment, has your ISP even published a similar statement to put their reputation on the line?
I think Cloudflare's commitment is plausible. They have a financial incentive to maintain their free DNS resolver's reputation and popularity, because they are selling points for their commercial authoritative DNS service; https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/dns/. Does your ISP have a similar financial incentive to behave?
"If it's free, you are the product" is not always true. Sometimes, if it's free, you are the marketing funnel.
Nowadays the meanings of our last names have largely disappeared, so you have countless Coopers who have never touched a barrel in their lives, whose children will be called Cooper also, despite that. I think it's a little sad that so much of what people call us is semantically equivalent to a random UUID with tons of namespace collision. With that in mind, I'd say "da Vinci" is more a last name than most of us have.
To my understanding, the argument made by autistic rights advocates is that people with the condition could usually live like anyone else, if society open-mindedly accommodated for them. This is already the norm for disabilities requiring e.g. braille or a wheelchair. Attempts to "cure autism" feel eugenics-ish because they're lazy intellectual shortcuts; avoid our shared responsibility of accommodating for differences, by erasing the differences.
In contrast, the case for abortion of Down syndrome fetuses is that the condition necessarily comes with many "built in" physiological complications that current medicine can't fully manage, effectively guaranteeing some amount of suffering that ends in early death, no matter how well we accommodate for them. They're not aborted to avoid accommodating, but to prevent suffering.
Like humans can be outright killed by touching some jellyfish, while turtles just eat them. I wonder if to turtles, jellyfish taste pleasurably spicy due to what chemical poisons us, like onions taste for us, which poisons insects. Overall, they're still good deals for the jellyfish and onions, since the traits are preserved.
But at that point, why not use that timestamp directly, to rate-limit each client's form submissions? What's the benefit of also issuing tokens? (Do you mean to thwart copy-as-curl script kiddies? Parsing a token out of a previous message to add it to a new one is a pretty low bar.)
Eh? 3.6k is Legend[5] which is 83rd percentile. https://www.opendota.com/distributions/ranks Maybe it didn't feel like it in an evenly matched pub, but objectively speaking you were very good.
But be as it may, I'm happy you've found hobbies you enjoy more.
I don't think they make much of a difference reducing traffic, since the requirements for a rating that will let you drive everywhere are really easy to fulfil. But I suppose they trim the worst of the worst.
Where can I see the data for this comparison? A quick search only brings up benchmarks of this db against itself on different VM setups, and the site doesn't link such a thing from anywhere I've thought to look yet.