27 karma · joined August 12, 2012
Mozilla could just as well be a victim of badmouthing.
Wonder why you haven't mentioned ETFs which are much safer than investing in individual stocks which may realize a 100% loss should the company file for chapter 11.
That should at least be <input type="password">
This works fine in a Content Scratchpad of nightly Firefox for me:
// See also
// https://github.com/richgilbank/ES6-Repl-Chrome-Extension/issues/12
function add(a, b) {
return a + b;
}
let nums = [5, 4];
console.log("foobar" + add(...nums));Firefox has an Addon Debugger.
Also https://addons.mozilla.org (AMO) has much more accountable guidelines than https://chrome.google.com/webstore/ (cws).
cws has a lot of issues with lengthy reviews as well https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!searchin/ch...
Over at AMO you can monitor the review queue position of your addon, and there is even IRC channels #amo-editors and #amo to talk to.
Review mails have specific feedback about issues they find.
Google extension reviews, bug reports (e.g. Chrome or Android bugs[1]), googlecode site support[2], are an ever growing super massive black hole.
[1] e.g. https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/list?can=2&q=blueto... [2] https://code.google.com/p/support/issues/list
I find Firefox less resource-hungry and with the WebIDE and Code Snippets that don't need to import/export to devtools source snippets it might even be ahead of Chrome.
Another great thing with the addon-sdk is it works with Firefox for Android as well (with some limitations).
Does Chrome for Android even have extensions yet?
http://www.wikiart.org/en/gustave-dore/the-inferno-canto-13-...
Either you are inside their walled garden, or out (the better place for me).
They don't seem to be interested in feedback on that site though.
{position: sticky} will definitely be a great feature to have.
I just think this confrontation in public (with one side as yet unidentified) will not work towards a solution.
While it sure provides negative publicity for the store owner, it would probably not further the career of the web designer either.
If you call it lispy it's gotta use parens.
The curlies immediately suggest some broken json or perl hash.
I can see the lispy spirit in applying the car to the cdr, and I like it!
One first bug report (or feature removal request):
makes it to the output, but is replaced with the U+00A0 character in the input textarea.
{p like so}
What's the concern with a real lisp syntax?
I for one like it!
Not Found
The requested URL /ripping-oauth-tokens-or-other-secrets-out-of-tweetdeck-twitter-app-and-other-apps/ was not found on this server.
See http://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.py?hl=en&ans... (Create shortcuts for other apps) which I found via http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7295508/javascript-captur...
All Google Chrome keyboard shortcuts are now not interfering when used in ymacs (C-j, C-k, C-n, C-p, C-t, C-w).
bad spell checking.
shameless self-promotion.
gathering requirements during dinner and compressing the schedule from 18 months to 9. I'm sure it was great to work in engineering there and keep those managers honest.
I am taking the time because that's the most emacsy (unintended bun) experience I've had in a web editor and to me that is a compliment.
I had to "Load its own code!" and read it to jump over these brick walls:
* C-x C-b is undefined
* C-h gives me a chrome://chrome/history/ lesson, but that might be chrome's fault
* M-x sounds the bell (why?) but "that's all she wrote". Neiter ? nor SPC do more than insert themselves in the minibuffer. Reading sources I find M-x switch_to_buffer (C-x b) would work, if only by keyboard (the menu does not allow one to actually pick an entry).
Why not implement C-x C-b? Would it be that hard? Or just let it do what C-x b does for now?
M-x ? and M-x SPC listing all available commands would be a big win too.
But a commad like M-x switch_to_buffer should not really be presented to an emacs user, make that M-x switch-to-buffer, even if some internal mapping may be needed.
This HN article links to http://tageorgiou.github.com/ymacs/ and [Try Out] there links to http://tageorgiou.github.com/ymacs/demo/
* It seems to have some character encoding issues in the modeline:
ymacs.frames[0].getModelineElement().innerHTML
"-- <b>test.js</b>  49% of 1.35k  (13,3) "
[Live demo] at http://www.ymacs.org/ links to http://www.ymacs.org/demo/
* Modeline looks good in this one:
ymacs.frames[0].getModelineElement().innerHTML
"-- <b>test.lisp</b> (1,0) "
brettcvz, mishoo, tomelam, keep up the good work, I really like this!
<base href="http://git.bytbox.net/ /> fixes that page, but pages reached from there are still suffering the some bad base href.