richard dawkins was no creationist either. the article mentions how his award was taken away for stating his opinion. Any thoughts on that?
1,288 karma · joined September 2, 2013
richard dawkins was no creationist either. the article mentions how his award was taken away for stating his opinion. Any thoughts on that?
"In an earlier post, I asked whether scientists might soon be forced to consider the occult as science. Perhaps some readers think the concern far-fetched. But consider: Science is as dependent on the concept of public truth as the great religions are. In an age when private truth is rapidly gaining in power, it is just as vulnerable as religion."
Feel free to downvote me.
"When OpenAI’s ChatGPT took the world by storm last year, it caught many power brokers in both Silicon Valley and Washington, DC, by surprise. The US government should now get advance warning of future AI breakthroughs involving large language models, the technology behind ChatGPT.
The Biden administration is preparing to use the Defense Production Act to compel tech companies to inform the government when they train an AI model using a significant amount of computing power. The rule could take effect as soon as next week.
"
Also, there's this:
Additionally, saying that children and adults should be wholly responsible for this is like saying the Chinese and not the British should be responsible for their opium addiction (see Opium War) and that homeless in San Francisco should be responsible for their Fentanyl addition. They can always just say no, right?
I worry that if nothing is done, this will only get worse, addiction will become the norm, of one sort or another, and you can just look at history of the Opium War to see where this leads.
“Remarkably, the letter’s signees include Ilya Sutskever, the company’s chief scientist and a member of its board, who has been blamed for coordinating the boardroom coup against Altman in the first place.”
Zuckerberg allegedly vetoed plans to ban filters that simulate plastic surgery on Meta-owned platforms, according to the unredacted lawsuit filed by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell (D), and ignored requests from top executives to boost investments in teens’ well-being."
“I wanted to bring to your attention what l believe is a critical gap in how we as a company approach harm, and how the people we serve experience it,” he began. Though Meta regularly issued public reports suggesting that it was largely on top of safety issues on its platforms, he wrote, the company was deluding itself.
The experience of young users on Meta’s Instagram—where Bejar had spent the previous two years working as a consultant—was especially acute. In a subsequent email to Instagram head Adam Mosseri, one statistic stood out: One in eight users under the age of 16 said they experienced unwanted sexual advances on the platform over the previous seven days."
The fines only slightly raise the cost of this raw material from $0, so it's unlikely to deter Meta's behavior until someone faces a more severe penalty there.
(1) https://apnews.com/article/silicon-valley-tech-investors-new...
(2) https://www.wired.com/story/itana-binance-charter-cities-ins...
This might be a theft disguised as a mere takedown.
.The technology could significantly change the face of battle by extending engagement times, and increasing range and damage, researchers say
How did you determine the scope of a chunk of memory? I believe you need this to run any of the GC algorithms.
I checked the hboehm documentation (1) and in the section on "Locating roots" it says "you don't want to know":
-Runtime stack(s): you don't really want to know.Need consistent caller-save reg. snapshot
-Static data segments: you don't want to know that either.
-Very platform dependent But you only have to do it once per platform.
This article reminds me of an idea I once had: to write a memory manager/garbage collector for C. The challenge is to know the scope of a dynamically managed chunk of memory. Using that, the memory can be automatically garbage-collected, but this is difficult since C wasn't designed for this in mind.
I'm curious if anyone has any other experiences they can share.
-Nvidia’s GH200 has the same GPU as the H100, Nvidia’s current highest-end AI chip, but pairs it with 141 gigabytes of cutting-edge memory, as well as a 72-core ARM central processor.
-"This processor is designed for the scale-out of the world’s data centers," Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said Tuesday.
>"Meta has axed a team that used artificial intelligence to create the first database of more than 600mn protein structures, in a signal the company is abandoning purely scientific projects in favour of building moneymaking AI products. The social media giant had employed a group of about a dozen scientists on a project called ESMFold, which trained a large language model capable of processing vast amounts of biological data to predict protein structures. The effort has been lauded by those involved in the development of new drugs and treatments."
That's really unfortunate- this might have been useful research for humanity, but not apparently a priority anymore. I hope they at least open source whatever they did. Here is the Github page for ESMFold:
Can anyone say how much each of those crypto tokens are worth in $USD?
“ The Trinity High-Explosive Implosion System: The Foundation for Precision Explosive Applications”
It’s really hard to believe this much detail about atom bomb construction is now public.
If Meta puts in all of the missing features- search, hastags, desktop access, but keep the goal of making it a ‘positive happy place’ would threads be able to replace Twitter?
Or put another way- why should someone post on Threads when they have Instagram?