179 karma · joined March 1, 2016
Same thing with the web. My computer, my rules.
But google of course is unhappy about it, and will try to frustrate as many users as it can until they can push their "web integrity" crap down users' throats.
So, electronic payments are of course more convenient... but they do indeed force us to go faster. They speed up transactions, reduce queues, and eliminate the need for cash.
I'm happy I can buy stuff online, but that in turns also makes me consume more.
You're speaking of some of cash issues... but have you thought about impacts on the the homeless of a 100% cashless society?
> Assuming ideal capacitive scaling[33] down to state-of-the-art feature sizes, the switching performance would be faster than DRAM, although testing on smaller feature size devices is required to confirm this.
So, they have no idea of its performance. Yet.
Sorry, but the burden of proof is on you. Please provide a study, or serious statistics proving your point.
You are assuming an extreme position that nobody expressed.
Technically speaking, it is an "ATA", but you can't control the FXS port, as it's directly linked to the number associated with the SIM card.
Another solution would be using a cellular router in conjunction with a "normal" manageable ATA, which lets you configure the FXS port with a remote SIP account.
I think you can even find some stuff on ebay/aliexpress that combines both functionalities, but I never tried them (and would be worried of lack of support or firmware updates).
Stuff I like:
- The mobile app is quite friendly
- It supports "automatic upload" (after opening the app)
- It supports deleting pictures from the device after uploading (to save space... much needed on the wife's old iphone)
- The pictures are stored hierarchically on the filesystem
- Very lightweight (the whole docker setup uses less than 128MB of RAM)
Stuff I'm not a fan of: - The web interface is "okay". It could use some modernizing.
- When there's no more space on the device, the app fails to upload new pictures, but gives no error message.
All in all, Piwigo is a solid 7.5/10 for me, but I'm watching and testing some other active software such as https://immich.app/"Adds additional buttons to jump through years."
Is that simply a typo or am I missing something? Shouldn't it be mostly random for long-term storage?
I realized at some point that there is a discrepancy between what's allowed on the file system, and "Windows" itself (or, more exactly, the programs running on Windows and using its APIs to communicate with said file system.
In this case, NTFS, totally allows for "illegal" characters such as < > : " | ? * etc... pretty much everything except / and \, and \0, I think.
This makes for funny situations, where sometimes Windows programs cannot deal with that. At best, they can't read, write or rename them... at worse they'll crash, which is always fun.
But... it's nice to have a system that has a very minimal footprint, which isn't exactly the case with a laptop.
Then again, we can argue semantics over "need" vs "want".
Most times, it acknowledges its error, and sometimes it successfully corrects it. That is, IF I give it specific enough information (ex: "why do you treat this variable as a string, it's a number?", or "don't you need to unpack the json first?").
Other times, it fixes something, but breaks something else in the process, and no matter of coercing makes it go to where I want.
But, yeah, the "confidently wrong" aspect needs to be kept in check. I tend to treat it as any other source of information... with a grain of salt.
What's neat with code is that you can prove the "truthiness" of its affirmations pretty quickly.
[0]: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=167388832715992&w=2
But we can indeed see plenty of work being done by devs. [1]
So, I don't know what to think, I haven't kept with more specific stuff, but is the work done not being merged since? I couldn't tell without serious grepping.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/ntfs3/da20d32b-5185-f40b-48b8-298692...
[1]: https://github.com/Paragon-Software-Group/linux-ntfs3/commit...
I'd also wish for a pentium pro article on the same vibe. Many people don't realize that it paved the way to even the current "core" series! In some ways, like the DX50, it was even better than its successors, although it was plagued by issues.
Although, eventually, when the miniGL port was released, it was clear that the V2x00s were sub-par, even with 24 bit support and hardware z-buffer. Eventually the voodoo2 just put the nail in the coffin. But for a time, little geek me had fun pushing the hardware limits, even though I knew nothing of thermal management at the time.
Indeed, I remember some DOS games having some... stutters? For lack of a better term. But at that point I was hooked on 3D and Windows 9x, so it didn't matter too too much.
Then followed a Cyrix 5x86 100GP in somewhere around 1996, which was a bit of an upgrade, since I could not afford Pentiums just yet with my own money. In 1997, I bought a Diamond Stealth II S220 as an alternative to a Voodoo, for the same "poverty" reasons. You have to know my parents were ... very much against computers.
As we started to get access to the internet in high school, I learned about overclocking, and oh my! was my system the best candidate for it! I could push the CPU to 120Mhz without additional cooling! The graphics cards, which bore a rendition verite v2100 chip, could also be overclocked quite heavily, but since the chips where bare, without any form of cooling, it became too hot, so I had to "MacGyver" my way around the problem.
I also have very fond memories of the socket 3 era... for me it started with the classics from id software, to Warcraft 2, Duke3D, LAN matches, Carmageddon, Quake, etc.. and all the early mods such as paintball, skin modding, what fun!
[0]: https://framablog.org/2022/12/13/peertube-v5-le-resultat-de-...
Who only uses their machine explicitely for gaming?
haha, gave me a good laugh. thanks, but no thanks.