Though GDPR would also ban this probably.
7,627 karma · joined March 25, 2017
Though GDPR would also ban this probably.
Literally today, but it feels like an improvement.
Also the demand is really there. Or do you think Apple just removed certain options from sale for fun in stead of RAM being out of stock?
Billions of people are getting access to information through it.
I agree the current US strategy behind tariffs is pretty retarded. Good example of fools trying to use a powerful tool.
Sorry, I'm European and can't keep up with the erratic US Gov. I read a summary at the end of the week.
It seems I've 'stung the wasps nest' on HN by not denouncing them outright it seems.
Tariffs aren't inherently bad, they're a tool.
In, say, China a worker doing 996 will make 720 items. Te average working hours in the Netherlands are 36 hours or so per week. Making 360 items.
As long as there is free trade the Chinese factory will simply outproduce the Dutch one since they utilise their capex better.
Obviously European workers can't be reasonably asked to compete in an open market when labour laws, salary, health inspection etc... in China are at a 1920 Dutch level.
Protecting workers from that kind of competition seems fair. Tariffs aren't bad in itself. They are just a tool.
Unfortunately fools wielding a tool like this can cause a lot of damage, but that's true for any tool.
Imagine how that would roughly unfold over a period of 70 years.
Sorry, I'm on mobile and it's a complex issue. This covers a lot: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groningen_gas_field#Phasing_ou...
To you.
But the existence of a secret police has a lot of upsides if you plan to not leave office.
Many people selectively shop around statistics that match their prejudice or their social circles social etiquettes.
Turns out even a proxy can be worth $8bn with the right business model behind it.
Users get an array of providers competing behind a single API, meaning they have to compete on price and quality not vendor lock-in. This encourages users to join OpenRouter over specific model vendors.
Providers get easy access to revenue (and data) and new customers with little to no ad spending, encouraging them onto the platform too.
And that's all you need. Win win.
Well done and congratulations.
This seems more plausible to me. "Bosom peril" is not in any way a synonym for cancer. But if you think 'cancer' as a word will trigger people then softening it with 'peril' makes sense.
I just don't understand this. It's not about hate or racism, it's about the speed of the change.
We've had too many immigrant, too fast. But since there's no brake on this thing apparently the only option normal politicians seems to have is to be dismissive of negative effects of mass migration so they don't have to admit there's no brake lever.
This then pushes people to a party that will at least admit the negative effects.
I honestly think that with my electricity prices running qwen 36B myself is more expensive than hitting the cache rate at deepseek.
Why is this provider specifically on the front page?
Also why is this not available over openrouter?
Even a completely closed US economy would not merit the current valuations Antrophic and OpenAI have.
Raw fucking intelligence at your disposal, free to download.
If you'd describe what's happening now to someone from five years ago they'd think you're hallucinating or mad.
These people paid a lot of money to Trump and now they want to cash in on that bought influence.
Weirdly enough it never seems to work that way in discourse.
Others report no issues but I had massive drain on iOS even with only 4 connections open.
Native wireguard is unnoticeable.