330 karma · joined June 1, 2023
The last line of your comment is the most interesting to me, electricity is more expensive than ever in Australia.
The major loads such as heating and cooling people Also want them immediately and not later.
Coding a web page for a neighbour is different since there are often no ramifications in the physical world if it doesn’t load or look exactly as desired
> Solar and wind systems today typically do not have a voltage setpoint or control loop. That's because there is no big gas/steam valve to adjust the amount of power generated. The operator wants to inject all the power from the sun/wind into the grid, whatever the voltage.
reactive power being easily controlled is the same as a voltage control loop with droop when connected to a larger system.
Control of the traditional prime mover by way of devices like steam throttle valve controls real power (MW) and not voltage or reactive power (MVAR).
I am curious how an inverter operating away from unity power factor fails to deliver roughly the identical amount of energy as at unity. Can you provide a link that explains it? Traditional generators pump out the same MW barring losses due to increased current no matter the power factor. MW in mechanical * efficiency = MW out electrical. And of course there is a limit to how out of phase the voltage and current waveforms can be, usually +/- 0.9 pf.
A 60Hz cycle is 16.7 ms, A 13 kV breaker takes 80ms to open, to detect a fault (except for differential element) let alone clear it takes a lot longer than 20ms.
The only thing that can help in that case is batteries.
98% of the power plants I’ve been to run the voltage regulator in voltage control mode with 5% droop. Solar and wind farms can do that too, and I am sure it is required by the system operators to allow them to connect.
If grid operators want more or less reactive power they call us and tell us to change our voltage setpoint on our plants. Can’t they do the same with solar and wind? The grid operator does not need real time control of the setpoint since the control loop responds in real time.
The problem we saw in Ontario when the market was introduced in 2001 or so was that it was politically unfavorable to have the extremely high prices, even for an hour let alone long term, that would encourage an investor to build a storage facility.
The house is not in the middle Of the lot so you can Sell half the land.
Honestly looks like a good buy from where I’m sitting in BC.
Is it adequate for you?
Either you rent for your whole life or you buy something and have to compromise on some of the variables. I see lots of people working hard, mostly in jobs they don’t love, and making those compromises and choosing to buy somewhere.
> despite literally not having a job, any prospects, or the possibility of owning a home at any point in my life, even as a software developer
I hope things turn around for you! I meant to point out that home ownership is possible, but it sounds like you have already evaluated the variables and if you are set on only living in some specific area then home ownership might not be possible in that location without a couple of well above average incomes.
For the first property I agree you would need to qualify without taking the rental income in to account.
Also agree on the banks being difficult to work with on including the future rental income when qualifying.
It sucks if you are a single person - probably have to go apartment route or 1 bedroom condo. The most successful guy I know, who has a pretty sick motor yacht now, had a room mate until his now wife moved in.