658 karma · joined October 19, 2012
Example: The current way we deal with respect for women in IT is to raise those problems, get people fired, give women the promotion preference, and shame reluctant minds. If those actions leave scars in the sentiments of males, we won't be any closer to peace, confidence and safety between the two genders.
After WWII, the German people started to learn French and the French people started to learn German, among a lot of similar things. We need to find what will lead us to work together and acknowledge each other's qualities, more than attacking each other on legal grounds.
When I lived in Sydney, I used to take the taxi often. And the rule was pretty much: If your address doesn't exist on Google Maps, they don't know how to get there. Even "At the corner of Hyde Park and Oxford St", which is in the CBD, returned a 404 from the driver's vocal API. They were all officially registered drivers, I just think cab's over reliance on Google Maps makes them unaware of the street names.
- Send one request for each level of hierarchy? Worst of all.
- Stored procedure? I don't think it would be optimised compared to a recursive query.
See also: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5861272/postgresql-with-r...
It is besides the point to know which side I am. In fact, I've just said tax complexity squashes new enterprises. I've written an article about how an entrepreneur in France loses 70% of his income in tax-and-administrative-burden [1]. So guess whether I enjoy redistribution or not?
[1] http://adrien-ragot.me/why-i-say-70-percent-tax-in-france/
So let's go ahead: Which forms of redistribution would do you see? Your comment made me notice that taxes proportional to the number of ads already exist (the VAT) and doesn't help redistributing. We need to take into account the change of scale. Would it be a tax per number of available cars for car-sharing services, then a tax per node in the friend graph for social networks? Sounds insane, but is it what we're bound to implement?
[1] http://www.culturecommunication.gouv.fr/Politiques-ministeri...
Surely they've brickwalled them in the employment contracts saying "The employee agrees not to publicize events happening inside the company, with no limit of time, or the employee agrees to compensate the company for the loss of image"? How come the OP doesn't mind talking negatively in public about his former company?
I've already signed a simple software EULA which specified: "You (the Customer) will not comment about the performance of the product in public".
So yes, anti-freeze isn't a surprising drink if better alcohol wasn't available.
Commercially, this is exactly the right thing to do! Then you can only blame customers for not buying shares of the spin-off!
More seriously, I laugh when former colleagues think of me as successful. It's correct that I've launched a successful product, but money is so random that I rather consider myself as "having fun and learning to launch a product" than "being successful".
With Twitter info, Google will be able to determine who are the leaders in the world. As the founder of a small, bootstrapped product, I know that my competitors are able to leverage way more followers because they're large service companies with small products. I've benefited from good rankings on Google due to several factors that didn't depend on the size of my audience, such as doing my Q&A in public (on Atlassian Answers). If Google leverages Twitter's social graph, it will probably give a preference to the pages of the bigger company with more followers.
Which is "a good thing" in the grand scheme of economics: People trust more the software of big companies than small ones, whether I like that or not.
I'd say you need to have a mentor, and in many cases it means having a psychologist. It takes hours to get over shyness and beyond all other hindrances of social life.