No, none of the above. Nope.
617 karma · joined July 9, 2013
No, none of the above. Nope.
> it is a new challenge that doesn't have a lot of good understanding around how to make it work.
It's been going on for decades now. Time to catch up. Good WFH culture is matter of effective management. Skills required:
- good communication (knowing how to use the tools we have, like IM, video, and yes, even email)
- being responsive (this is a habit that must be cultivated in many cases)
- focus on goals and achievements instead of distractions like seeing someone in a hallway and assuming that if they seem to be working, they must be working
- it's part of a political power/control game
- "this is the way we've always done it"
- they buy into the myth that "magic" happens in hallways conversations and nowhere else
There are plenty of large companies (and god knows how many startups and SMBs) who have recognized what a colossal waste it is to maintain permanent offices and mandatory facetime. It's time for the rest to stop pretending it's 1980.
OTOH we have too many people anyway, so if they want to leave because of "$17 salads", that's fine. Maybe we can eventually drive places again, without traffic jams. A man can dream.
Setup = rep groups, internal services, etc? You need k8s-savvy ops people, or really good devs who like ops stuff.
OTOH if a service is available and would work for someone's use case, by all means, use the service. I've set up native k8s clusters just as exercises, and it's no picnic–and I didn't need to manage those clusters, later. Just doing build exercises alone was enough to scare me straight.
I'm not sure I agree about templating YAML files–why is templating JSON any better, really?–but YMMV.
Slack? I use it, but I don't see the attraction. It's just another chat client with a couple of cute features. I'm really not clear on why the world seems so enamored with something that's really not much of an improvement on something we had in 1995.
If the businesses are based on bullshit, then he's probably right. If the valuations truly are wildly out of control (and it does seem like it), then sure, they're due for a correction.
It's also worth keeping mind that if there are 144 of these startups, 90% of them is 129. That doesn't add up to that much money in SV terms. This seems like a tempest in a teapot. People love to make headlines, it seems, with "OMG bubble OMG!"
It's as old as the fourth amendment.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Sigh. I really wish that smart people would stop spreading myths. Ruby, at least, performs quite well. The "Ruby is slow" days are years behind us.