An example I still remember. Someone asked How much it cost for AOL to distribute all those CDs in the 90s... and Steve Case answered!
https://www.quora.com/How-much-did-it-cost-AOL-to-distribute...
3,037 karma · joined March 7, 2007
Email me at arn@normalkid.com, follow me on twitter: @arnoldkim.
An example I still remember. Someone asked How much it cost for AOL to distribute all those CDs in the 90s... and Steve Case answered!
https://www.quora.com/How-much-did-it-cost-AOL-to-distribute...
https://www.ama-assn.org/residents-students/preparing-medica...
Which references a cdc documebt
Ultimately when enough of the population is vaccinated, you’d expect the majority of hospitalizations to be vaccinated.
If he wrote it in a blog, it would read weird or he’d spend a lot more time on it. I’ve started blog posts before and just kinda gave up when it didn’t seem like it came together well.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2021/05/11/jeff-b...
I'm sure you don't know. No one knows or has a frame of reference. It was chosen to emphasize the narrative. It's like comparing the carbon/waste from mining, manufacturing, delivery and use of a electric car vs. the carbon from burning a tank of gas -- and saying "ah ha! the total lifetime of an EV is worse for the environment than driving around town in a gas car"
The reason that works is that basis is reset at death.
You can make an argument that income and capital gains should be taxed at similar rates, but it feels like they are being purposely misleading in their presentation, when they use unrealized capital gains as the denominator.
No one else’s taxes are viewed through that lens.
Ask yourself who would spend hours watching people play sports, and it might not seem so foreign.
"Change in Net Worth" or something would make it clearer. But it's still not great.
You have a very straight forward value prop. "Next episode" of some-show. I think these sort of optimized results are probably things that Google has been algorithmically adjusting for.
Looking at the Ranked 1-3 terms you dropped for, it seems you dropped some pretty big terms and even keyword terms.
You were #1 for "seal team next episode", but now you rank #3. #1 got replaced by CBS's page, which is arguably a better result.
"black clover new episode" also dropped from #1. Replaced by Wikipedia.
"the good place next episode" similar story.
I don't know what the best move is here. Algorithmic changes are really hard to combat without major changes and even then, you don't have a ton of room to wiggle with next-episode content.
I have had Safari open for 23 hours on my M1 MBP, and it is using ~800mb of memory right now. Extensions are the most likely culprit.
edit: https://twitter.com/hondanhon/status/1329132372034347009
The original Atari 2600 Pac Man was notoriously bad. Someone made a much better version in 2014.
http://retrogamingmagazine.com/2015/09/07/pac-man-on-atari-2...
https://atariage.com/forums/topic/229152-new-pacman-for-atar...
If you are on a website in mobile safari, and you hit the share button, and select Copy. What gets copied into the clipboard is actually the Canonical url rather than the actual one you are at.
So for /amp/ pages, it ends up copying the non-amp url.
imo, it's a bad experience because sometimes canonicals and non canonicals aren't exactly the same. For example, if I'm looking at a specific filter or sort, then it might make sense for the canonical to be the non-sorted version. But if I'm sharing a specific url, I want it to share exactly what I'm looking at.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-electio...
https://litfl.com/minimum-inhibitory-concentration/
It’s more of a spectrum of concentrations. A resistant bacteria is one that doesn’t grow above a certain threshold. But longer exposure or higher concentration will change the effectiveness.
I really enjoyed this video explaining how he got around making the gameplay easier (not just 1 life) but also made it make sense to the story.
You have 3 lives... but 3 different lives: