asibahi

The usual answer is that they pretend these differences dont exist and use one blessed (maybe artificial) dialect.

This publisher copy is neither pedantic nor wordy. It is just a market blurb for the book.

The thing that frustrates me the most about AI is how every thread in every forum spend half the time arguing whether an article is AI or not, as if bad writing only started to exist with AI. Just fucking don't read it.

Plenty of alternatives to Glyphs. FontForge and Robofont both come to mind.

This text doesn’t seem AI generated to me.

I read the article and I still dont understand what a blind reading test is.

The Zig compiler compiles lazily and does not detect dead code. (Read: functions that are not called from any compiled functions)

I don’t understand this comment. Are you implying omitting the chicken is some sort of conspiracy?

Writing a C Compiler is really good. I enjoyed myself doing it with Rust and Zig.

I like this article. It puts to words something that has been in my mind for a while.

I love this. Any chance of having this be a downloadable application somehow?

> right handed presents some challenges too (my hand will come over letters I've just written and there's a risk of smudging them

You’re supposed to place your hand under the line you’re writing. Not to the right of it.

I’d argue that was active aggressive, actually.

Not to get into an argument, but most of the population in the Middle East are Muslim who don't give two shits who killed Jesus because they don't believe he was killed to begin with.

Over the past few days I have been making a spell checking TUI app. I used AI (meaning: free Gemini web interface) to discuss various aspects about the apps and debug compiler errors ang suggest useful rust crates for various problems.

Just a more helpful discord chat generally. It also gaslights you too!

Here is the tool: https://git.sr.ht/~asibahi/hoopoe

This can’t be serious.

It’s hacking when it’s someone you don’t like.

You made me curious. Has anyone invented new ways to ride horses in the age of the automobile?

It’s definitely a great tinkering language but .. eh .. the Zig team and community are extremely opinionated about how to use the language correctly.

I am saying as far as anyone other that the Bytecode Alliance is concerned it is custom API for Bytecode Alliance projects.

The component model is still in phase 1 (standardization is phase 5) and the Bytecode Alliance are its sponsors and the ones pushing it into the ecosystem with wasmtime.

I’m confused. Why not start the conversation in Polish?

Submitting a patch requires talking to other people.

His initials

This was a very interesting read. I wonder if similar techniques can apply to Turkish or Japanese dictionaries?

It works if you use Noto Emoji as the font.

No it is not. If you were introduced to the term via LLMs doesnt mean everyone was.

I do, but where does it say so in the spec?

This is the wat2wasm tool I have been playing with: https://webassembly.github.io/wabt/demo/wat2wasm/

It refuses to accept the following

    (module
      (func (export "addTwo") (param i32 i32) (result i32)
        (i32.add 
          local.get 0
          local.get 1
        )
      )
    )

which based on my reading should be accepted.

I will try the tools you mentioned but I personally settled on generating the unfolded ones for my experiments as they just seem easier.

This `dup` seems entirely useless it actually supports the case for omitting it fron the instruction set.

I am saying that textual wasm uses `a b +` (justl ike binary wasm) and `(+ a b)` is just a nicety.

It is explicity sugar for the stack operations, per my reading of the spec.