Working on some UI improvements and wanted to bring some structure to my process. Still working on it, but this helps.
543 karma · joined March 24, 2010
Working on some UI improvements and wanted to bring some structure to my process. Still working on it, but this helps.
http://codeascraft.etsy.com/2010/09/17/frank-talk-about-site...
2009: Aardvark
2008: Zoho
2007: Twitter
2006: YouTube
2005: 37signals
2004: Flickr(Ludicorp)
Look at these "little companies" from just a few years ago. I love the new speed of business.
It's been a week or so with no follow-up, so probably not in.
But, I love this movement of successful companies giving back to the startup community. Good press, good business, good will with future customers.
MailChimp rocks. Good luck to everyone that applied.
"What happens when employee #2 makes off with your code and roadmap and marketing data and customer list, moves to Bolivia, and starts selling your stuff world-wide at one-tenth the price?"
Rest of the article here: http://blog.asmartbear.com/unfair-advantages.html
The difference was night and day. As expected, the Siebel API was practically useless. Yantra's was rock-solid. No better way to make sure your API is solid than to use it internally.
I think there is an important lesson to be learned here. We've been searching for flights online for over a decade, and yet there is still room for what (now) seems like ultra-obvious innovation. You can bet that flight search is not the only market where looking at a problem through the lens of "what's best for the user" can lead to a winning business.
Moment of Zen from Adam's presentation: why does Orbitz even have a checkbox for "I prefer nonstop flights"? (Worse, it isn't even checked by default!) Got a big laugh from the crowd- nervous laughter from some, I'm sure.
It also strikes me as a dangerous strategic move. The reason I originally selected Chargify over competitors like Spreedly and CheddarGetter is because they had the lowest entry cost. I can experiment and find product market fit. By that point, I don't care so much about the monthly cost (and I'm locked in to a product that I like, which helped me reach my goals). The new pricing model is extreme enough to make me revisit the decision. I'm sure I'm not alone.
I find their product and support to be great, and I'd like to see them keep a similar model. Maybe they should lower the thresholds (free up to 10 paying customers, for example). I'm sure there are other models that will work for them and their customers.
Then: 1) I never sacrifice dinner with my family and I try to "be home" from 5-9. Not just physically, but mentally and emotionally.
2) Always prioritize your most difficult work first. If you start with "check HackerNews", time will disappear. Finish a use case first then reward yourself. Pick a new feature to ship each night and the progress will fuel you.
3) I've never liked working super early in the morning, so I take quick power naps in the evening (30min to 1hr.) to refresh and work from 10-1. Solid, uninterrupted 3 hrs.
4) Passive work (like catching up on HN, other sites) can be done with MacBook in lap on the couch if you want to unwind with some Tivo.
5) Don't be afraid to invest appropriately. I'm actually taking vacation next week to complete my punch list: finish coding, meet with an advisor, attend a trade show and prepare product for beta.
I know there could be many reasons for this, but developers who take advantage of this advice will have a _huge_ advantage over their peers.
1. It will reduce the chance of rejection for "incomplete site"
and more importantly:
2. It will allow you to start customer development and usability testing, which might be a better use of time right now anyway (before hours are invested coding and integrating).
I doubt your toughest challenge will be integrating an API. Your toughest challenge will likely be getting users to love the results.
Best of luck! It's great to see some of the recent innovation in the travel tech space.
What's amazing is how consistent you've been over the years. I remember seeing a steady flow of good advice from you 5 or 6 years ago on the Business of Software discussion boards. Best of luck in your latest endeavors and thanks for the cheatsheet.
On that note, anyone interested in helping us with StartMetrics (http://startmetrics.com)?
It's a service that tracks lean startup metrics for SaaS products. We're currently inviting folks to sign-up for the beta test when it's available. We'll also be sending a few customer development surveys.
This article inspired me to share (ahead of schedule) some info on a new service we’re building to provide some of the lean startup metrics Tor mentioned, designed specifically for SaaS products.
We’re looking for folks interested in beta testing and providing customer development feedback at StartMetrics (http://startmetrics.com).
Plus, I think it’s fitting that we’ve been using one of the themes Tor listed. Took just a few hours to get the basic design up and running, which gives us more time to work on our MVP
Earn my trust, give me an app that is good enough to convert, and Let me decide.
My apps don't require a card to signup. I'm now working to improve conversion in the funnel and I want to start with the widest funnel possible.
As for multiple trials? I use email as a unique identifier. It isn't 100%, but I haven't seen any abuse (including the gmail address+whatever@gmail.com tweak). Not sure I would do anything about it if I did. My customers tend to be busy managers who don't have time to game the system. They'll just expense it anyway.
I'm loving Rails so far, especially after being able to start from scratch and build a viable, working, commercial, revenue earning app in just a week. I'm sold, but scanning the horizon cautiously.
Referral link: http://getclicky.com/245493
Non-referral link: http://getclicky.com
http://www.slideshare.net/hnshah/mintcom-prelaunch-pitch-dec... (I believe this was a study done by MBA students, correct me if I'm wrong)
http://www.garage.com/resources/perfectingpitch.shtml (solid Art of the Start advice on what to cover)
Along the lines of removing technology, we've enjoyed using a mockup tool (like Peldi's Balsamiq or Mockingbird) for capturing story flows and wireframes. I know it's tech, but these tools do such a good job of removing the tech it's barely visible.
And from the article, a diagram that captures the idea behind MVP fairly well: http://rubypond.com/images/scheduling-stories.png