5,905 karma · joined January 15, 2015
that's like the third most common form of lying
auth system that worked well with static file buckets would cut like 40% of backend DB / server needs
close your eyes, think of a family member, who is it, where are they, what are they wearing, can you see details about the clothing, can you see details in the background, is there motion, if you open your eyes can you still see it
there will be some very strong yeses in there if you sample people in visual professions
and yes c++ builds are unnecessarily hard and waste time for beginners and experts compared to most newer languages
not sure either of these means 'open source is a diversion', but would agree with a different conclusion that commercial software can lead to better user outcomes sometimes. adobe is an example where they squander some of that value add by making the ancillary experience miserable
to the comparison w/ reaper's scripting -- my guess is reaper invested a lot of iterations and user research into creating a usable scripting system. getting this right is hard in the same way as creating an intuitive and productive UX
go-kart track: folks who came in through groupon never converted to repeat customers at full price
boutique fitness franchise: classpass users have low or negative margin, and don't convert to full price. they may be useful to fill out a part-empty class because that incurs no extra cost, but if you're spending new money to host them it's not economical
opposite case of this is pharma, where the subsidies go up the stack instead of down. arguably goodrx is the 'true' price, and the retail price you pay as a walk-in is drastically inflated
there are also communities of people who rotate credit cards to chase the best reward / rebates deals; imo they are behaving rationally in the face of an industry that offers bundles which decline in value over time
if gov owns the sensors, they no longer have to beg AV operators for crash data
48k miles in the interstate = 80k km, 400k posts, 4 billion dollars (and you can start regionally)
could also run semi-autonomous convoys where a robot truck follows a human truck, extending sensor range
velocity is a vector. ICs may bear some responsibility for its magnitude but direction is straight from the top baby
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-produce-one-mil...
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/construction-progresses...
^ not just ukraine but I think they're the farthest along this curve
the legal system uses certified mail as a proxy for this and digitally there is nothing better
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34627712
I have zero accounting background, but my understanding is that salaries are normally deductible from revenue. Before this change, SWE salaries were deductible from tax bill under R&D credit? And after this change, SWE salaries can only deduct from tax bill under 5 year amort?
(Interested to hear correct version if someone actually knows)
(but also re 'whole point', not sure about split btwn people who want their own genetic profile vs searching for long-lost twin)
https://ncpro.sog.unc.edu/manual/706-2
nothing about specific licensing
also NC is a daubert state, which I think means you can attack the testimony's methodology via motion in limine, but doesn't add anything about the expert's qualification
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/daubert_standard
that said the engineering + survey act seems fairly clear that evaluating the safety of a public work constitutes 'practice'. if dude has 20+ yoe he could just take the exam under the 13(a3) long-established practice section
https://www.ncleg.net/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bycha...
he ignored them, defense submitted formal complaint, board ended up seeking declaratory judgment that both his research and his testimony separately violate the Engineering and Land Surveying Act
from the opinion https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Nutt-v.-Ritter-opi...
> The Board seeks a counter-declaration that Nutt's engineering work for the plaintiffs in the Autry litigation, including his engineering calculations, analysis, and resulting expert report, constituted the unauthorized practice of engineering. The Board also seeks the same declaration regarding "testifying at the discovery depositions in support of the work contained in the expert report prepared by Wayne Nutt."
so is it an error? or a necessary phase of growth
but yes it is good to graduate beyond it
> 9. Sell features, before building them. Ask existing users if they want this feature.
> 15. Don't build consumer apps. Only b2b. Consumer apps are so hard, like a lottery. It's just 0.00001% who make it big. The rest don't. Even if I got many users, then there is a monetization challenge.
^ these in particular stand out and all connect together. many plans never say who you will sell to, how to reach them, and how much they will pay. beware the urge to start working before these questions are answered
without thinking about, and talking to, customers, you can dwell safe + warm in your solitary brain for far too long
it didn't feel like my ad privacy had been enhanced