3,051 karma · joined November 20, 2018
Human brains were not designed for this kind of task. Everything about the task prompts a resting mindset but the task requires 100% full concentration for hours.
If you were driving at 30km/h it would be almost impossible to seriously hurt someone even if they stepped out in front of you.
To be able to safely handle pedestrians the self driving car would have to limit itself to much slower speeds or place fences around every road. I guess we will find out in a few years which option was preferable.
The car either drives itself with no user input required at all or it needs constant user input.
I have tried to explain so many times that this system needs to be replaced urgently not for security reasons but because no one actually knows how to use rails 1 anymore.
Once paired to the app the first time it doesn't require it again and you can use them as regular bluetooth headphones. I'm guessing some product manager decided that not enough people were installing the app and had a change made so you were forced to use it at least once.
The physical cable probably did work. Initially I thought it wasn't working until I looked it up and found out you have to push it in harder before it clicks a second time
I recently got a pair of Bose QC 35 headphones and out of the box they are non functional until connected to the app. I had to borrow a phone to connect them to the app to set up and then thankfully they started working on my own devices with bt and wired without needing an app.
Headphones should just work out of the box. The only useful function the app provides is firmware updates and a way to map the button to NC level.
Its not ridiculous if you think of an operating system as a tool for generating profit for microsoft.
It is ridiculous if you view an operating system as a tool to serve only the users needs and not suck all of your data up for advertising.
This is unacceptable under the GDPR. You must allow users to opt out. If this affects your business model than the legal option is to remove the free plan and charge a fee for the service.
Browsers have been trying this for a long time but its not simple. Chrome has had multiple attempts at making it impossible to detect incognito mode but people keep finding ways. The old way was checking if the API to store data was available so chrome made it so that there is an emulated data store for incognito mode and then websites just check how fast the local data store is to check if it is on disk or in memory.
It would be an extraordinary effort to remove all of these issues since many of them are outside of the browser like what exact gpu and driver is in use could slightly change how the page is rendered or how long certain things take.
You are assuming that is actually an option. There is nothing to suggest the current Australian government would not prevent you from resigning until the task had been completed. This is the same government currently attempting to make it illegal to boycott businesses that are damaging to the environment.
I want a browser that can get the task done with the least friction possible and a legal system that prevents abuse. The website should be the one to inform me that they are actually using the audio api for tracking and not just playing audio. With a large penalty for lying.
If we were talking about the issue of people being stabbed you don't suggest "Why should the stabber be penalized? The victim should have been wearing a Kevlar vest that doesn't allow them to be stabbed. If they weren't then they should simply expect that people will stab them."
In order to survive an unlivable climate you would need some advanced technology which I'm not sure how you will maintain or source replacement parts after society has collapsed.