barotalomey

Sure, I get that. But the term gained popularity in 2012 it seems, according to google trends.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=SJW&hl=e...

And there's a entry from 2011 in urbandictionary.com, so maybe that's around when it was coined.

> When my provisioning system installs a package by name, i expect it to work in the same way as before.

But where do you put the blame?

The distro for making that change, or the redis company for breaking your software stack?

Problem is, redis threw their users under the bus by relicensing [1], and user would end up with an outdated redis version.

1: https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/0b34396924eca4edc52446...

> But money are needed to pay the folks that work at open source software

Cute. Can I have a check for my redis contributions now please?

Awesome, finally!

RIP Microsoft

Oh... I got too excited by the headline.

Thing is, I have a RSS reader already. It's free and open source, isn't updated 8 times a week, works without access to your microphone and it would never try to sell me Nitro.

What I want (and what I thought this was), is to be able to convert certain discord channels into rss feeds.

To OP: If you want a self hosted feature complete rss aggregator, I recommend you try https://www.freshrss.org/

TLDR; No: just rebranded

> Usually, acronyms are followed by the full wording the first time they are mentioned.

I'm sure they did at the time this (SJW) acronym got popular. That was maybe 10-15 years ago.

Primarily, processing input.

In 2025, most online users have learned how to look things up using.. the internet.

> by contesting the very existence of articles on individual episodes of TV shows, software, or video games, which are all completely uncontroversial on the English one.

In the first year or so of the english Wikipedia, I was very engaged in adding content but never really tried to engage with the community. I started adding articles about my topic of interest at the time, which was New York 80s punk and hardcore bands. Soon, I had the lot of my articles deleted for "lacking relevance".

I haven't been contributing much since.

That's how nothing ever works outside fiction.

That's why github added emoji reactions many years ago, so you can express "me too" without spamming the notification systems.

https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/add-reactions...

google "godot 4 tutorial", not "godot tutorial"

> You and I do not understand assembly language.

Having written z80 and x86 assembly since the 80s, being knee deep in several decompilation projects and a couple of emulators since then, I can safely tell you that I do know a handful assembly languages and at least 2 syntaxes.

I believe other seniors have similar skill sets, for now.

Rather, it's the version without a dependency on PERL.

Eh, if that was the point then please, go ahead and show me this magical AI system that produce "edible" level of code then.

All I seen so far is badly generated boilerplate and enough template spaghetti to confuse some CS dropouts by the looks of it.

Obtuse maybe, but I'm not missing the point. Their point is nonsensical, given that LLM generated code isn't "as good as fast food compared to home made meals" or even comparable to "food".

Go ahead and explain why I'm missing the point.

> If anything, LLMs have surprised at much better they are than humans in understanding instructions for text based activities.

That's demonstrateably false, as proven by both OpenAI's own research [1] and endless independent studies by now.

What is fascinating is how some people cling on false ideas about what LLM is and isnt.

Its a recurring fallacy that's bound to get it's own name any time soon.

1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43155825

The real treasure was the friend I found along the way

https://github.com/keszybz/add-determinism

You might find The Library of Babel fascinating [1, 2]

1: https://libraryofbabel.info/

2: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9480949

Hence the tradition of numeric file naming in *.d directories.

> and you have not provided arguments to that effect

The burden of proof lies on those with extraordinary claims. I am simply skeptical.

Ah, so that's why Minecraft got so incredibly popular, because realism. /s

You meant to say that people's expectations have shifted. That's expected seeing the amount of hype this tech gets.

Hype affects market value tho, not reality.

> The gap between Sr and Jr skills with close as AI gets better.

Sorry, but as the wind blows, we only have indications of the opposite so far and it's wildly reported as a generating losing their ability for deep thought, relying too much on automated code generation. This is especially damaging for juniors, who never get the chance to learn the tricks of the trade in the first place, and they're the ones having a hard time explaining what the code the LLM generated even does.

Seniors will be few and far between, and we will charge premium for fixing up the crap LLM created, which will fit us great before retirement.

Good luck when we are retired.

It's always "soon" for these guys. Every year, the "soon" keeps sliding into the future.

The 40th known copy of the work of fiction "Suite Vulgate du Merlin"?