Are you saying that the article is wrong because empirical studies haven't been done on topic?
Do you think programming productivity is possible to measure and if so how?
38 karma · joined August 31, 2013
Do you think programming productivity is possible to measure and if so how?
Valter Longo has recommended at least 4-5 days to treat auto-immune disorders [1].
I've done 5 day fasts. For something serious I would try 7.
[1] http://joshmitteldorf.scienceblog.com/2014/06/12/the-three-d... “3 days is optimal for mice. For humans 4-5 minimum, depending on what you are trying to achieve”
Estimating in a complex system where one problem triggers another, cascading with feedback loops, is a messy business.
So the outcome could be either far more or far less dire than we think.
As you put it, know one knows for sure. So it's prudent to assume the worst.
I'll never forget the cheering and applause Thiel got from Republicans when he announced he was proud to be gay at the RNC. That was a pretty special moment.
He has a long record of being pro-LGBT and if he was going to backtrack on that to appease his supporters he would have done it before the election, not now after he already has their votes.
Destroy = something big enough ruin your quality of life.
And it would have been a good idea to do that back in the 50s when doctors were calling it safe without the science to back up their claims. "You have no evidence" is what you say to justify avoiding something suspect, not what you say to justify consuming it!
Personally I'd increase the discount to around 10% (raising the base price to compensate) and have "Allow us to use this as a sample" checked by default; but I wonder what % of people have a strong reaction like the OP here.
Gonna give me a counterexample there too?
Where's your citation backing up your suggestion that it's safe?
Anyone suggesting Soylent is safe with arguments like "glucose is glucose" and "it has the right macronutrient ratios" is spouting pseudo-science.
If you have insufficient evidence that something is safe and a strong anecdote suggesting otherwise the logical option is to abstain.
Attempting to bring science into the decision making process when the science has not been done is pseudo-science!
(Burger King costs $9.99 with no offer.)
And now you buy the Big Mac without making a scene.
A. Happy to pay the full price!
--
Q. Price $117. Can we use this as a sample? (No: +$3)
A. No fucking way I'm paying $3 NOT appear in your gallery of samples!
I count 6 stories on the front page that are older than this with less points, e.g:
9. Virus stole poison genes from black widow spider (bbc.com)
155 points by kawera 10 hours ago | hide | 25 comments
We need transparency or food companies will cut corners at every turn to save costs and put the publics' health at risk.