bilkoo

Moonshot Brands | Remote | Toronto, ON/Miami, FL | Full-time | https://www.moonshotbrands.com.

We are a ecommerce brand aggregator, we acquire emergin ecommerce brands and operate them with the combination of human excellency and artificial intelligence.

Openings:

  * CTO. 
  * Sr Data engineer. 
  * Software engineer. 
  * ML engineer. 

https://jobs.lever.co/MoonshotBrands?team=Technology.

Or e-mail me directly: bill.gu a@t moonshotbrands d0t com

I think lots of companies compensate for take-home tests (as we are doing now). Also I think the willingness to do a take-home is in itself a good filter (but you gotta make it interesting, as parent said)

Moonshot Brands | Remote | Toronto, ON/Miami, FL | Full-time | https://www.moonshotbrands.com we are a ecommerce brand aggregator, we acquire emergin ecommerce brands and operate them with the combination of human excellency and artificial intelligence.

Sr Data engineer: https://moonshotbrands.breezy.hr/p/7ca4524d3a56-sr-data-engi....

Software engineer: https://moonshotbrands.breezy.hr/p/d6033f4026d2-software-eng....

Principle data engineer: https://moonshotbrands.breezy.hr/p/cc3fb677919b-principal-da....

Or e-mail me directly: bill.gu a@t moonshotbrands d0t com

No I meant the PoS machines

Not sure about other places, but in Canada it seems most cannabis stores use Pax

“Talent hits a target no one else can hit. Genius hits a target no one else can see.” - Arthur Schopenhauer

By exploit, do you mean offering them jobs that pay higher than local average? Or that developing countries have weaker institutions for labor laws?

Would make a good South Park episode

The stock market is not 'people', but rather composed mostly of institution money and their managers. And due to the short term and relative performance goals, if they want to keep their jobs or fund from withdrawal better escape the stampede before everyone else. As to your question though, people may think the Fed has little room for stimulus this time around.

I don't think you need to learn all possible matchups to play any matchup, as a human would. You'd need to just learn how to play/counter each hero, plus some 2 or 3 hero combos (not all permutations), so on the order of a hundreds?

Operant.ai | Toronto. ON (ONSITE) | Full-time | Fintech/AI | Full-stack developer CTO | http://operant.ai/ |

Our mission is to become the world’s leading debt collection intelligence platform. We work with leading financial institutions and accounts receivable groups to revolutionize the collections process. By integrating the rich data and machine learning to personalize the collections approach in order to improve customer experience, increase repayment rates and maximize retention.

We are looking for an entrepreneurial full-stack developer as CTO. Bonus if you have experience in enterprise software, SAAS, and banking. Email me: allan AT operant DOT ai

Agreed. So shovel for dopamine?

Sounds like doctor-as-insurer, financially speaking.

Prompted by this comment I looked up Theranos' investors. Turns out Rupert Murdoch was in Series A. What irony!

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/theranos/investors/i...

"Sociologists have long understood that people rely on elite cues to form their opinions. It’s difficult to understand the nuances of every issue, so Americans generally adopt the views of people who share their values. " I guess this will always be the case, that cue being religion, politics or other ideology.

Well couldn't it have been the opposite? Hypothesis: maybe this kind of research has the least marginal return, therefore only the most profitable funds are willing (or able) to invest in it (Bridgewater would invest $10M for 0.1% of improvement while a small fund can't afford that luxury given that 0.1% is fund size independent).

I think it's for people who are too lazy for grocery shopping but not lazy enough to just order takeout. That's a tiny sliver on the laziness scale IMHO.

Wait, what do you mean Intel abandoned China?

Individually, maybe. Let alone the ethical implication of 'tax them high enough so they don't retire early', artificially lowering the income of a trade would - to your point - constrict *supply of labor. And of course this would lower the total productivity of the industry and society.

And the Ford example, while interesting, doesn't have to do with taxes does it? It has to do with Ford lowering the barrier of entry for factory workers AND increasing productivity rate at the same time. I think we can all agree that that advancement was good for society as a whole?

Am I understanding you correctly? Or is there something I am missing?

Marginal return. If working an extra hour per day will give me $100 pre-tax, tax rate being 10% and 90% will largely determine whether I'd do the extra work, versus spending that hour with family etc. Everyone has different threshold for pay/fun ratios but overall society will be less productive as tax rates go up at least in the static sense (not considering tax money being put into productivity-increasing use).

This is such an interesting question so I made a blogpost about it: https://medium.com/@kwbil/the-poor-are-shunned-even-by-their...

I doubt we can even find a contemporary software company with that kind of market share to begin with, let alone the severity of bugs. Windows in the 90s perhaps?

And look at how many Swiss watches he's buying!

> struggling to produce their most important car ever

Isn't this part of not executing the roadmap as planned? Put another way, how do you know if they are on the right trajectory to profitability? How much are they ahead/behind?

A lot of Finns speak Swedish as their mother tongue

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish-speaking_population_of...

Would it make more sense to show the full search keyword suggestions? Most of them are truncated when on a smaller screen (desktop)