blackbird_t

Weak argument... This is specifically talking about race not personal preference. Nice try though.

Gay activists is a more appropriate term. And many people might agree with you they are "big meanies" looking for a fight.

As far as funding campaigns that support their moral views as a "private" company, why is that so bothersome? They don't get out in front of a microphone in the public media and state this fact every time they get the chance. Although Bezos seems to think this is a good idea.

Gay right=Civil right=Yeah right

The court's don't agree with your loose definition of civil rights and neither do I.

Here's the latest example: http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-chick-fil-a-m...

If the gay community would just leave this company alone he wouldn't be forced to stand up for his views (in public) in the first place. I've known this family for years. They are good people and don't wish any ill will on anyone regardless of their views. The gay community just won't accept the fact that Chick-fil-A will never agree with their moral stance. BTW, this has been going on for years.