91 karma · joined January 2, 2019
At my age this doesn’t bother me but I do wonder if there’s a lower maintenance dose that would work for those who got all the weight loss benefits they are going to get via medication alone.
My mainframe indoctrination there.
In terms of screen reading width, there's some sweet spot where characters per screen "page" and characters per line are easily readable without the text being "big". I need to be able to move my eyes left to right without losing track of my vertical position on the page.
This isn't a COBOL issue (if it's even an issue at all), it's a data design issue. As many have pointed out, there are reasons for this possible origin date.
My choice of Emacs was based on what I see as a fragmenting of (Neo)Vi(m) ecosystem. When writing extensions, I was uncomfortable with a "which of the three languages do I use" decision. The only common language is old Vimscript, and both forks are moving on from it and neither seems willing to support the other fork's preferred language.
That's their right, to be sure. It's just a deal breaker for me.
I had been jumping back and forth between Vim and Emacs for several years in my hobbyist persona for years. When in hobbyist mode, I prefer to avoid anything that reminds me of my professional mode.
VS and Code are noisy and intrusive. Emacs and Vim (and Neovim) are not.
[edit: grammar]
Have you tried zig? I'm casually looking for a C replacement and I took a quick look at zig but came away not liking the community vibe (some things were too dictatorial for my tastes).
If you did anything with zig, how would you say the languages compare?