2,208 karma · joined August 11, 2019
Although there are lots of therapies which claim to do this, I don't believe that most of them work very well. We've hardly begun to recognize this problem, let alone solve it. But once you start to recognize it, you see that its effects are so profound that little else is of primary importance.
If you think that's the best thing to do then why not do it?
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2000/06/the-unluckiest-m...
It used to be that Stripe could be relied on not to do this sort of corporate doubletalk. The OP asked a direct question and you've given a misleading PR answer.
I'm sure you're a nice person just trying to do your job, but your inevitable PR posts to HN, within minutes of anything Stripe-related coming up, are hurting your cause. The Stripe of the past would never have spewed propaganda like "This is the point of Stripe. A single stack that flexes with your business as it grows and pricing that's public" into HN threads. It's embarrassing, and what it's telling us is that culturally you've lost your way.
Maybe that's inevitable on your way to world domination, but if you guys can no longer communicate honestly or treat readers as intelligent, you'd be better off not posting here. I like Stripe, by the way. I know this is harsh but I would like it to be helpful.
This is consistent with Bowie's genius to be more an early adopter type than a visionary type. A hell of an early adopter.
Not that you said otherwise, but... I think we should go back to a transactional mix-and-match style of politics, with different coalitions per issue, instead of the "agree with your friend tribe and disagree with your enemy tribe about everything" style that we seem to be locked into these days. There shouldn't be any shame in being part of the same coalition on one issue with people who are reprehensible on other issues. Agreeing with the Florida government about some point of social media regulation doesn't imply I agree with them about anything else.
https://twitter.com/stylewarning/status/1571585280217579521
What boggles my mind is that Python has had billions of dollars of direct and indirect investment, with participation from every nook and cranny of the software syndicate—academia and industry—yet... this is all you get.
Edit: You misunderstood baobabKoodaa in the same way. Nobody is arguing about what constitutes an interpreter, except you. The question is what language is being interpreted.
Before accusing someone of pedantry, it would first be good not to completely misread them.
If a plane crash killed a few hundred people, no one would question the need for a thorough investigation, root cause analysis, and preventative measures for the future. Or consider the security reforms put in place after 9/11, which killed thousands. This pandemic killed millions.