104 karma · joined January 3, 2021
I agree that privacy is important, but it's not absolute, by law. So what we're saying is E2E apps are more important than current law we have, and we want to invalidate the ability of the police to investigate crime.
How can that make sense?
I just added:
- SMS - Authenticator app (Authy, of course) - Generated backup codes
That in addition to my Pixel 4, and maybe 3-4 authorized devices (laptop, ubuntu desktop, windows desktop), I feel a bit better about this.
Sorry for your trouble though, I hope you figure it out.
Might also make you explore diving more which is a ...whole other world.
Good luck and take care.
- who pays for the service (ads? users pay? Average user will never use a paid service if a free one is available)
- how to resist attacks against the algorithm (Google has been fighting spam for decades)
- how to personalize without invading privacy, e.g. Google had an option to search through your email in Google search...it's gone now, I wonder why?
It could satisfy some people's curiosity or if they are a lawyer, they could save a few grand on PACER, but for everyone else this is a privacy disaster.
I hope you take this down eventually.
This might look cool or even useful to some, but it's straight up immoral.
E.g. why nginx is much faster and lighter than Apache and MySQL connections are cheaper and faster to create than Pg.