learnt a lot in the process too - kudos to him
261 karma · joined May 17, 2023
learnt a lot in the process too - kudos to him
folks have created software by "vibe coding". It is now time to "face the music" when doing so for production grade software at scale.
(couldn't resist adding it. i acknowledge this comment adds no value to the discussion)
But often such teams in faang come up as a by product of someone’s empire building and that is unfortunate for others involved in it.
Also helps that they are in a culture which does not mind killing services on a whim.
split the entire coursework into two parts:
part 1 - students are prohibited from using AI. Have the exams be on physical papers than digital ones requiring use of laptop/computer. I know this adds burden on corrections and evaluations of these answers, but I think this provides a raw answer to someone's understanding of concepts being taught in the class.
part2 - students are allowed, and even encouraged to use LLMs. And they are evaluated based on the overall quality of the answer, keeping in mind that a non zero portion of this was generated using an LLM. Here the credit should be given to the factual correctness of the answer (and if the student is capable of verifying the LLM output).
Have the final grade be some form of weighted average of a student's scores in these 2 parts.
note: This is a raw thought that just occurred to me while reading this thread, and I have not had the chance to ruminate on it.
1. the majority user base does not care and/or is not willing to pay for the ads 2. these platforms/products do not want to cater to the minority that cares about their privacy and not being exposed to any advertising
while America has a bounty of public land acreage wise, 4 years and a complete control of the government is a lot of time to do some lasting damage to the ecosystem by opening up these areas for privatization.
can i ask how you went about arriving at this workflow?
yet to see if this new model is able to do any better on that regard
this product on some levels, when looked at in isolation, feels as useless as did Rabbit's R1. However, Microsoft is a ginormous corporation, and hence can keep on throwing releases like these at the wall hoping something stick. The leaders will never learn, and I am sure, despite all the good points raised in this article, this release will be or is already being celebrated as a success within the internal circles.
[1]https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https%...
I ask because I hypothesize that the impact of these raising temperatures will be seen more widely and adversely in parts of developing countries given their population density and inability to address the same.