289 karma · joined June 9, 2019
Uploading the manuscript to a preprint server and/or submitting to another journal, which Adamala is doing/planning to do, is the normal response.
Sending it to journalists beforehand is what I consider an overreaction.
That's being kind; it's a complete overreaction, simply put.
Some would argue that 0-based indexing is significantly less elegant for numerical/scientific code, but that depends on whether they come from a MATLAB/Fortran or Python/C(++) background.
A decision was made to target the MATLAB/Fortran (and unhappy? Python/C++) crowd first, thus the choice of 1-based indexing and column-major order, but at the end of the day it's a matter of personal preference.
0-based indexing would have made it easier to reach a larger audience, however.
> and is no harder to understand than 1-based indexing for people capable of programming.
The same could be said the other way around ;-)
The generality of the part descriptions made me chuckle.
> A bevel gear with a circular base and a series of angular, tapered teeth extending radially outward. The teeth are uniformly distributed around the circumference, allowing for meshing at an angle with another gear. The gear's face includes a set of holes, varying in size and symmetrically arranged around the central bore, likely for weight reduction or mounting purposes. The central opening likely acts as an axle or shaft attachment point. The design facilitates the transmission of rotational motion between intersecting shafts, typically at a 90-degree angle.
Also, we don't know by how much the most optimistic predicions were exceeded.
Makes for nice marketing ;)
It's best used for internal calculations where the symbols better match the actual math, and makes it easier to compare with the original reference.
But a U.S. Government Accountability Office report in 2023 revealed the rules governing the F-35 parts. The report noted that the parts are the property of the U.S. government until they are installed on another nation’s aircraft.
(Actually a monkey-patched version to be able to set njit arguments)
Damn, it would have been a nice benchmark if they did do a comparison against numba/cython.
> Some timings for the Shed Skin 'sieve' example (n=100000000) and several Python implementations/optimizers:
cpython 3.10.6: 13.4 seconds
cpython 3.11.0: 11.4
nuitka 0.6.16: 11.4
pypy 3.9.12: 5.8
numba 0.56.4: 2.5
shedskin (master): 1.9
> Note that Numba defaults to int64 as integer type, while Shed Skin defaults to int32. Performance is practically equal when using shedskin --long.> Since 2001, OGRE has grown to become one of the most popular open-source graphics rendering engines, and has been used in a large number of production projects, in such diverse areas as games, simulators, educational software, interactive art, scientific visualisation, and others.
conda install -n base conda-libmamba-solver
conda config --set solver libmamba