Sites like The Numbers have to take on the cost of surviving the AI onslaught and the AI companies return nothing back to them.
6,753 karma · joined June 21, 2025
Sites like The Numbers have to take on the cost of surviving the AI onslaught and the AI companies return nothing back to them.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/tech-and-telecom-law/big-tech-...
Maybe Epic Rap Battles of History has the answer:
In 2025 BYD sold 4.6 million vehicles. Tesla sold 1.66 million. That particular war is already over. Tesla lost it.
Toyota has been the best selling automaker for the last 6 years straight. In 2025 Toyota had record sales with 11.3 million vehicles sold: https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/toyota...
BYD was 6th: https://carnewschina.com/2026/02/26/three-chinese-automakers...
Tesla isn't in the top ten.
https://electrek.co/2025/10/22/tesla-changes-all-cars-have-s...
Instead of "lite" versions of the software, what they should do is upgrade all cars to the latest hardware for free. Currently that's AI4.5, which soon will be made obsolete by AI5:
https://electrek.co/2026/01/26/tesla-quietly-starts-shipping...
https://screenrant.com/disney-movies-dvd-physical-media-rele...
And it has outsourced its physical media business to Sony:
https://variety.com/2024/film/news/disney-sony-pysical-media...
Musk pledged his commitment to China's core socialist values. He also thinks Taiwan should submit to China:
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/elon-musk-signs-letter-p...
I find HN's automatic title editing annoying. It's wrong more often than it's right. I think it's a misfeature.
Teslas aren't the most high-tech these days. They have fallen behind on the hardware side, particularly in charging and batteries. Here's a charging speed comparison:
If an LLM is trained on GPL code then that code has become an intrinsic part of the model (because if it hasn't then what was the value of training on it). So shouldn't that model now also be licensed GPL?
And how do I know the LLM output is not reproducing substantial chunks of GPL'd code, making my code GPL?
It can count as native. You can turn on Native AOT compilation:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/deploying/nati...
What's easiest for both users and developers is royalty-free video formats.
AV1 is solution to these video format licensing problems. Microsoft is part of the Alliance for Open Media: https://aomedia.org/about/members/
Dolby has made direct threats to the royalty-free status of AV1: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/av1s-open-royalty-fr...
So Microsoft and all the AOMedia members will need to defend AV1 if they want it to remain royalty-free.
They won't change it unless you give them a reason.
Switch to macOS or Linux. That will give them a reason.
I'm sure they train their models on open source software, so how do I know that LLM generated code doesn't reproduce substantial chunks of, for example, GPL licensed code? If indeed there are GPL violations, what are AI companies doing to police themselves?
I wonder if open source licenses will start to include "not to be used for LLM training" clauses.
Everyone who uses Amazon Prime Video: https://www.amazon.science/blog/how-prime-video-updates-its-...
Everyone who uses Google Sheets: https://web.dev/case-studies/google-sheets-wasmgc
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/02/making-webassembly-a-first...
As per the article, that's temporary until Component Model 1.0 is implemented natively in the browser. In the meantime, jco can be used:
> The groundwork for browser implementations is being laid today: jco’s transpile command already converts any component into equivalent core Wasm and JavaScript glue, making components runnable in any browser without native support.
That's no longer needed once native support is there.
https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Screens...
Easy to do, simple to achieve. No more Russians need to die.
But users also include users of the code. There's no value in self-flagellation via terrible code or pointlessly complicated frameworks.
I guess banks don't want to invest in training their people.
A decade ago Tesla claimed to have delivered all the hardware needed for full self-driving.
They were lying.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqZsoesa55w
That extra 25% becomes worth it.
Nothing will become obsolete. AV1 will stick around for a long time. And YouTube still does H.264 encodes to support old devices.
Netflix uses AV1: https://netflixtechblog.com/av1-now-powering-30-of-netflix-s...
YouTube uses AV1. It's tough to be more mainstream than that.
Right click on a YouTube video and select Stats for Nerds. If your system is capable of it, chances are it will be playing back in AV1.
Most of the YouTube videos I watch these days are AV1 encodes. Sometimes it's in VP9 and occasionally it's H.264.