26 karma · joined December 6, 2019
I enjoyed the book and class myself but it did not make me a better physicist, just a better mathematician
The article isn't even about military readiness either. Making the military more friendly to married couples is a fine goal, for sure, but the ones who chose that life know the caveats involved and if they don't like it, they leave.
China may have the largest branches of services, they are hardly the best funded and most prepared. Wars have not been decided by who is bigger for a long time.
And to top it off, the Russian progress into Ukraine is largely stalled and has mostly been a shitshow for Russia. Their propaganda machine is scarier than their military incursions.
I give it a function, tell it to write a test and it largely gets it right most of the time. I have to tweak it but the time spent is a lot less than if I did it myself
The biggest thing I've had it writing for me recently though - unit tests. It writes them much quicker and even though I have to tweak them, the shell is done and allows me to focus on more important things after I verify and modify them.
Not only that, every time I've gotten a Teams link for an interview, the desktop app tells me "this version is only for organizations" then the webapp refuses to load.
A huge pain when every other client I've used (Discord, Webex, Zoom, Google Meet) works with minor tinkering.
As a result, I have picked up a variety of skills to fit into whatever my company dictated what a Data Engineer should handle
Senior Data Engineer with 15+ years of Python experience and a background in Physics and Math. Can't wait for the new "Who's Hiring"
Not really saying he isn't political, but he's not over here reading Rush Limbaugh' autobiography
The caveat that comes with these formulas is that they don't treat all baldness equally. Typically the type of male baldness that recedes backwards until gone (think George Castanza) doesn't have any methods that work other than getting implants