6,080 karma · joined January 5, 2017
Socials: - bsky.app/profile/benjaminschneider.ch - linkedin.com/in/schneiderbenjamin - benjaminschneider.ch - x.com/bschne
---
Ben Eater (low-level digital hardware stuff, builds a computer from gates basically)
Thought Emporium (Molecular Bio)
The Coding Train (Creative Coding)
Also nice to just watch random MITx & similar lectures sometimes
> 1.1 Why You Should Want to Know About Abduction > If you are consulting this book with malicious intent, looking for ways to expand your criminal pursuits, I encourage you to stop reading and to better your life. (...)
Total noob question but how exactly does this part work? It seems like if you record close to the 4h transmission limit of data between contacts it wouldn't be possible to catch up on next contacts and not fill up the recorder. Is it not possible to record that much data in the timeframe between contacts, or is there some safety margin in the transmission limit they state for this reason?
The FAQ on the front page provides a hint as to why this might be superior to just using an SVG or PNG.
Secondly, I believe there's a flipside to many of the things that can go wrong when interacting online. Maybe if you read something without knowing the other person, and without having a ten-year history with them, and you can re-read and take time to ponder your answer, it also allows you to be more thoughtful and not let all the baggage people have with each other in the way?
Of course you could argue that you always have to be very careful not to overload and bloat your software product, especially if it's an OS — but windows contains two different consoles, about three versions of the system preferences management, ..., it just doesn't seem like MSFT to be that picky about what they'll put into their product.
Yes, I feel like this is somehow still massively underappreciated. They pulled off a major hardware transition without big hiccups (I'm sure someone's going to point some I have missed in the comments /s) and launched a bunch of devices that are an incredible leap forward. I mean the baseline M1 air starts at $1k and is an incredible piece of hardware for most usage.
The most striking example is probably the experiment Tadelis convinced eBay to run on their brand-name ads, though the subtlety applies to less obvious cases of questionable ad spend too — https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/stadelis/Tadelis.pdf
It mostly just means you need to be very careful in interpreting the results, or be careful when someone uses it to motivate policy prescriptions as they themselves may have a questionable interpretation — like with any academic finding.
But the fact that a company can do this to another company at the flick of a switch by changing the rules of the game on a whim is still kind of scary, even if I think it's for the better in this instance.