buddhistdude

I wasn't but it's an interesting connection

now imagine what the guy who invented AI must've thought on his first motorcycle ride back from work

I believe he was making a joke

A friend of mine has heard of it too. He says it doesn't really last after the high though unfortunately

Better legalize MDMA then

He said something about moths and rust consuming matter and with that at the very least he pointed out quite clearly the source of our suffering in regards to the AI transformation

Really makes you think

You forgot stim dick

I have to remember the "time dilation" excuse for the next production issue lol

edit: maybe the path to unlimited processing speed is to send a data center through space near speed of light. That's how it works right?

I just flamed out exactly as you describe. It's my second time also. If anyone has any tips for some kind of counseling or coaching or anything else, would be much appreciated.

What does it matter how difficult it is? That only means it's gonna take a while longer.

It can move to any place within the search space but it can't move outside of it and it can't move in between the 'pixels'. Human thought can, as human thought has created the search space.

would love to see a statistic by model, and maybe some sort of classification to get a sense of how good the model is and how much it costs.

edit: this exists https://artificialanalysis.ai/

I want it to not murder or opress lots of people by mistake

I think what you are talking about is a different kind of cheating than the parent comment

Just to think what this will look like in a couple of years.

No I don't because I'm not claiming that I know that it happened

I take from this that you don't, otherwise you would explain it

How do you know?

Maybe that's what Jesus used on the people that he healed

if it was so obvious to most of us, we wouldn't be having this problem.

Well at least you for yourself can be aware of the danger that AI could assimilate your thinking, I think that's the message of this post.

"The cryptocurrency industry super PACs dumped $14.2 million into the Illinois primaries. 90% of that – $12.8 million – was wasted, in that it went to opposing Democratic candidates who won their primaries"

I read that as them having mistakenly sent the cryptos to the "opposing candidate"

oh about that one... we killed it unfortunately

it would take for him to be less powerful and psycho

you can with the one that I use

Well, things change fast in the age of AI

hazrmard's law

was this written by an LLM?

including the mentioned meta-analysis? if yes, can you explain why you think that it's dubious?